The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cancer-related fatigue - a difference of opinion? Results of a multi-centre survey of health professionals, patients and caregivers

Cancer-related fatigue - a difference of opinion? Results of a multi-centre survey of health professionals, patients and caregivers
Cancer-related fatigue - a difference of opinion? Results of a multi-centre survey of health professionals, patients and caregivers
The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of patients with cancer, their caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about fatigue and its impact on quality of life. It was a cross-sectional survey, the respondents were patients with cancer attending three UK regional cancer centres (n = 1370), their informal caregivers (n = 1370) and a random selection of HCPs (oncologists/nurses/radiographers/haematologists; n = 1098). The response rates for patients, caregivers and HCPs were 42%, 33% and 34% respectively. Fatigue was reported to affect 56% of patients and to have a considerable impact on quality of life. Caregivers also recognized that fatigue was a common problem, with significant effects on patients' quality of life and impact on themselves. Healthcare professionals recognized that fatigue was a common problem for their patients but overestimated its impact on some aspects of patients' daily lives. Although most HCPs reported that they prescribed/recommended treatment for over half of their patients, only 14% of patients reported receiving any such treatment. The most common advice was to take more rest and relaxation. Conclusions: patients with cancer report that fatigue is a common and distressing symptom and the importance of this symptom is generally recognized by both HCPs and lay-carers. Healthcare professionals need more information about the effectiveness of existing interventions for cancer-related fatigue and further research is required to improve the current management of this debilitating symptom.
0961-5423
20-27
Stone, P.
f1f833e8-14e1-4d58-acab-5a861a7bd442
Ream, E.
8f79582d-e1c0-4cc9-ae71-14b543567d63
Richardson, A.
a5adbf25-d0c1-4169-9a96-6186d1bbef5a
Thomas, H.
6482f172-19a3-4f91-a2e4-f6b1cd55ccdd
Andrews, P.
96b9d3bb-5236-4fb5-addd-841943220c19
Campbell, P.
ca7d0d26-3d26-4069-b3ef-6b92054cca11
Dawson, T.
527aaa1f-a54e-4ecb-9ab1-28f3fd0ae4bc
Edwards, J.
a454058a-6fc8-4700-a764-e0a36587a0d3
Goldie, T.
bab598b8-a092-488e-b99a-876395d0c92d
Hammick, M.
dfe1bb8c-412f-402a-81f6-5805fcf6923d
Kearney, N.
ec9fe053-0076-4642-884d-ff26d4353aae
Lean M,, M.
373b55f5-9556-479e-9dd9-2d0fbc3c9c24
Rapley, D.
bdec4459-c9f3-4980-8a5f-8e3c3ac35780
Smith, A.G.
8051e9d5-c35f-49c0-a2f0-91501f9aa72f
Teague, C.
458e7383-07a8-4cba-bc5b-a5058d14649f
Young, A.
20a873cc-c298-4207-961d-40d7fe04f556
Stone, P.
f1f833e8-14e1-4d58-acab-5a861a7bd442
Ream, E.
8f79582d-e1c0-4cc9-ae71-14b543567d63
Richardson, A.
a5adbf25-d0c1-4169-9a96-6186d1bbef5a
Thomas, H.
6482f172-19a3-4f91-a2e4-f6b1cd55ccdd
Andrews, P.
96b9d3bb-5236-4fb5-addd-841943220c19
Campbell, P.
ca7d0d26-3d26-4069-b3ef-6b92054cca11
Dawson, T.
527aaa1f-a54e-4ecb-9ab1-28f3fd0ae4bc
Edwards, J.
a454058a-6fc8-4700-a764-e0a36587a0d3
Goldie, T.
bab598b8-a092-488e-b99a-876395d0c92d
Hammick, M.
dfe1bb8c-412f-402a-81f6-5805fcf6923d
Kearney, N.
ec9fe053-0076-4642-884d-ff26d4353aae
Lean M,, M.
373b55f5-9556-479e-9dd9-2d0fbc3c9c24
Rapley, D.
bdec4459-c9f3-4980-8a5f-8e3c3ac35780
Smith, A.G.
8051e9d5-c35f-49c0-a2f0-91501f9aa72f
Teague, C.
458e7383-07a8-4cba-bc5b-a5058d14649f
Young, A.
20a873cc-c298-4207-961d-40d7fe04f556

Stone, P., Ream, E., Richardson, A., Thomas, H., Andrews, P., Campbell, P., Dawson, T., Edwards, J., Goldie, T., Hammick, M., Kearney, N., Lean M,, M., Rapley, D., Smith, A.G., Teague, C. and Young, A. (2003) Cancer-related fatigue - a difference of opinion? Results of a multi-centre survey of health professionals, patients and caregivers. European Journal of Cancer Care, 12 (1), 20-27. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2354.2003.00329.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions of patients with cancer, their caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about fatigue and its impact on quality of life. It was a cross-sectional survey, the respondents were patients with cancer attending three UK regional cancer centres (n = 1370), their informal caregivers (n = 1370) and a random selection of HCPs (oncologists/nurses/radiographers/haematologists; n = 1098). The response rates for patients, caregivers and HCPs were 42%, 33% and 34% respectively. Fatigue was reported to affect 56% of patients and to have a considerable impact on quality of life. Caregivers also recognized that fatigue was a common problem, with significant effects on patients' quality of life and impact on themselves. Healthcare professionals recognized that fatigue was a common problem for their patients but overestimated its impact on some aspects of patients' daily lives. Although most HCPs reported that they prescribed/recommended treatment for over half of their patients, only 14% of patients reported receiving any such treatment. The most common advice was to take more rest and relaxation. Conclusions: patients with cancer report that fatigue is a common and distressing symptom and the importance of this symptom is generally recognized by both HCPs and lay-carers. Healthcare professionals need more information about the effectiveness of existing interventions for cancer-related fatigue and further research is required to improve the current management of this debilitating symptom.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69096
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69096
ISSN: 0961-5423
PURE UUID: de909997-9cf4-4a7e-a217-3a2158cb5126

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Dec 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 19:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Stone
Author: E. Ream
Author: A. Richardson
Author: H. Thomas
Author: P. Andrews
Author: P. Campbell
Author: T. Dawson
Author: J. Edwards
Author: T. Goldie
Author: M. Hammick
Author: N. Kearney
Author: M. Lean M,
Author: D. Rapley
Author: A.G. Smith
Author: C. Teague
Author: A. Young

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×