The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods.

Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods.
Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods.
Background: effective communication is increasingly recognised as a core clinical skill. Many health and social care professionals, however, do not feel adequately trained in communicating and in handling interpersonal issues that arise in the care of patients with cancer.
Aim: the aim of this paper was to assess the effectiveness of different training methods used in communication training courses for health professionals.
Method: we searched six computerised databases and augmented this with follow-up of references and grey (unpublished) literature. We included all studies evaluating communication training and assessed methodological quality according to the standard grading system of the Clinical Outcomes Group. Data on author, year, setting, objectives, study design and training methods were extracted and compared in tabular format.
Results: a total of 47 studies potentially assessing communication training were identified. Sixteen papers were included evaluating 13 interventions. Four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (grade a); the others were grade III. Eleven interventions trained health professionals; two trained medical students. Interventions for training in communication skills were characterised by the variety of communication approaches used and a diversity of methods. They were applied to health professionals with very different roles, served different purposes and evaluated a variety of outcome measures: behavioural assessments, patient outcomes and professionals' self-report.
Conclusions: the best results are to be expected from a training programme that is carried out over a longer period of time. Learner-centred programmes using several methods combining a didactic component focusing on theoretical knowledge with practical rehearsal and constructive feedback from peers and skilled facilitators proved to be very effective. Small groups encouraged more intensive participation. Training in communication for both medical or nursing students and senior health professionals is advisable.
communication training, health professionals, cancer care, systematic review, training methods
0941-4355
356-366
Gysels, Marjolein
54b0973c-096d-422a-94d3-5103431b8b5f
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Higginson, Irene J.
8bff8e06-57f3-491b-ab81-2ecf983f52f3
Gysels, Marjolein
54b0973c-096d-422a-94d3-5103431b8b5f
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Higginson, Irene J.
8bff8e06-57f3-491b-ab81-2ecf983f52f3

Gysels, Marjolein, Richardson, Alison and Higginson, Irene J. (2005) Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods. Supportive Care in Cancer, 13 (6), 356-366. (doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0732-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: effective communication is increasingly recognised as a core clinical skill. Many health and social care professionals, however, do not feel adequately trained in communicating and in handling interpersonal issues that arise in the care of patients with cancer.
Aim: the aim of this paper was to assess the effectiveness of different training methods used in communication training courses for health professionals.
Method: we searched six computerised databases and augmented this with follow-up of references and grey (unpublished) literature. We included all studies evaluating communication training and assessed methodological quality according to the standard grading system of the Clinical Outcomes Group. Data on author, year, setting, objectives, study design and training methods were extracted and compared in tabular format.
Results: a total of 47 studies potentially assessing communication training were identified. Sixteen papers were included evaluating 13 interventions. Four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (grade a); the others were grade III. Eleven interventions trained health professionals; two trained medical students. Interventions for training in communication skills were characterised by the variety of communication approaches used and a diversity of methods. They were applied to health professionals with very different roles, served different purposes and evaluated a variety of outcome measures: behavioural assessments, patient outcomes and professionals' self-report.
Conclusions: the best results are to be expected from a training programme that is carried out over a longer period of time. Learner-centred programmes using several methods combining a didactic component focusing on theoretical knowledge with practical rehearsal and constructive feedback from peers and skilled facilitators proved to be very effective. Small groups encouraged more intensive participation. Training in communication for both medical or nursing students and senior health professionals is advisable.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2005
Keywords: communication training, health professionals, cancer care, systematic review, training methods

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69111
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69111
ISSN: 0941-4355
PURE UUID: 9335210a-0868-44b6-af58-33e83d009465
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Nov 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marjolein Gysels
Author: Irene J. Higginson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×