The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.

Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.
Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.
Background: the assessment of patients’ needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centred cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. This review discusses the importance of systematic assessment of needs in routine care and the contribution tools can make to this process.
Method: a rapid appraisal was undertaken to identify currently available tools for patient assessment in cancer care through searches conducted with Medline and CINHAL databases. It focused on tools for the systematic assessment of individual patients’ needs for help, care or support, to be used for clinical purposes—not for research or other purposes. Tools that focused on a single domain of care such as psychosocial needs were excluded, as were studies of patient satisfaction. A wide list of search terms was used, with references stored and managed using bibliographic software.
Results: in all, 1,803 papers were identified from the initial search, with 91 papers found to be relevant; although 36 tools were identified, only 15 tools were found to fit our criteria. These were appraised for their validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and feasibility, including acceptability to patients. The process of their development and psychometric properties were reasonably well documented, but data on how feasible they were to use in practice was scarce. Each tool met some but not all the widely accepted criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. None were found to be complete for all dimensions of needs assessment. Most have not been sufficiently well tested for use in routine care.
Conclusion: there is a need to continue to develop and test tools that have the attributes necessary for effective practice and to research their effects on the quality of supportive cancer care
systematic review, care needs assessment, cancer care, patient assessment
0941-4355
1125-1144
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Medina, Jibby
9609f0e0-edeb-4156-a640-6d380d93f2e2
Brown, Vivienne Brown
5c010ecf-1e0d-437b-97ea-05b20c51a48c
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Medina, Jibby
9609f0e0-edeb-4156-a640-6d380d93f2e2
Brown, Vivienne Brown
5c010ecf-1e0d-437b-97ea-05b20c51a48c
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca

Richardson, Alison, Medina, Jibby, Brown, Vivienne Brown and Sitzia, John (2007) Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15 (10), 1125-1144. (doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0205-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the assessment of patients’ needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centred cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. This review discusses the importance of systematic assessment of needs in routine care and the contribution tools can make to this process.
Method: a rapid appraisal was undertaken to identify currently available tools for patient assessment in cancer care through searches conducted with Medline and CINHAL databases. It focused on tools for the systematic assessment of individual patients’ needs for help, care or support, to be used for clinical purposes—not for research or other purposes. Tools that focused on a single domain of care such as psychosocial needs were excluded, as were studies of patient satisfaction. A wide list of search terms was used, with references stored and managed using bibliographic software.
Results: in all, 1,803 papers were identified from the initial search, with 91 papers found to be relevant; although 36 tools were identified, only 15 tools were found to fit our criteria. These were appraised for their validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and feasibility, including acceptability to patients. The process of their development and psychometric properties were reasonably well documented, but data on how feasible they were to use in practice was scarce. Each tool met some but not all the widely accepted criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. None were found to be complete for all dimensions of needs assessment. Most have not been sufficiently well tested for use in routine care.
Conclusion: there is a need to continue to develop and test tools that have the attributes necessary for effective practice and to research their effects on the quality of supportive cancer care

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2007
Keywords: systematic review, care needs assessment, cancer care, patient assessment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69123
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69123
ISSN: 0941-4355
PURE UUID: 676e30be-c7f5-4036-8bae-561d51add7b4
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Nov 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jibby Medina
Author: Vivienne Brown Brown
Author: John Sitzia

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×