Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.
Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.
Background: the assessment of patients’ needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centred cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. This review discusses the importance of systematic assessment of needs in routine care and the contribution tools can make to this process.
Method: a rapid appraisal was undertaken to identify currently available tools for patient assessment in cancer care through searches conducted with Medline and CINHAL databases. It focused on tools for the systematic assessment of individual patients’ needs for help, care or support, to be used for clinical purposes—not for research or other purposes. Tools that focused on a single domain of care such as psychosocial needs were excluded, as were studies of patient satisfaction. A wide list of search terms was used, with references stored and managed using bibliographic software.
Results: in all, 1,803 papers were identified from the initial search, with 91 papers found to be relevant; although 36 tools were identified, only 15 tools were found to fit our criteria. These were appraised for their validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and feasibility, including acceptability to patients. The process of their development and psychometric properties were reasonably well documented, but data on how feasible they were to use in practice was scarce. Each tool met some but not all the widely accepted criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. None were found to be complete for all dimensions of needs assessment. Most have not been sufficiently well tested for use in routine care.
Conclusion: there is a need to continue to develop and test tools that have the attributes necessary for effective practice and to research their effects on the quality of supportive cancer care
systematic review, care needs assessment, cancer care, patient assessment
1125-1144
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Medina, Jibby
9609f0e0-edeb-4156-a640-6d380d93f2e2
Brown, Vivienne Brown
5c010ecf-1e0d-437b-97ea-05b20c51a48c
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
October 2007
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Medina, Jibby
9609f0e0-edeb-4156-a640-6d380d93f2e2
Brown, Vivienne Brown
5c010ecf-1e0d-437b-97ea-05b20c51a48c
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Richardson, Alison, Medina, Jibby, Brown, Vivienne Brown and Sitzia, John
(2007)
Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.
Supportive Care in Cancer, 15 (10), .
(doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0205-8).
Abstract
Background: the assessment of patients’ needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centred cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. This review discusses the importance of systematic assessment of needs in routine care and the contribution tools can make to this process.
Method: a rapid appraisal was undertaken to identify currently available tools for patient assessment in cancer care through searches conducted with Medline and CINHAL databases. It focused on tools for the systematic assessment of individual patients’ needs for help, care or support, to be used for clinical purposes—not for research or other purposes. Tools that focused on a single domain of care such as psychosocial needs were excluded, as were studies of patient satisfaction. A wide list of search terms was used, with references stored and managed using bibliographic software.
Results: in all, 1,803 papers were identified from the initial search, with 91 papers found to be relevant; although 36 tools were identified, only 15 tools were found to fit our criteria. These were appraised for their validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and feasibility, including acceptability to patients. The process of their development and psychometric properties were reasonably well documented, but data on how feasible they were to use in practice was scarce. Each tool met some but not all the widely accepted criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. None were found to be complete for all dimensions of needs assessment. Most have not been sufficiently well tested for use in routine care.
Conclusion: there is a need to continue to develop and test tools that have the attributes necessary for effective practice and to research their effects on the quality of supportive cancer care
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2007
Keywords:
systematic review, care needs assessment, cancer care, patient assessment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 69123
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69123
ISSN: 0941-4355
PURE UUID: 676e30be-c7f5-4036-8bae-561d51add7b4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Nov 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jibby Medina
Author:
Vivienne Brown Brown
Author:
John Sitzia
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics