Does the patient-patient held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review.
Does the patient-patient held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review.
Objectives: to assess the effectiveness of the patient-held record (PHR) in cancer care.
Background: patients with cancer may receive care from different services resulting in gaps. A PHR could provide continuity and patient involvement in care.
Search strategy: relevant literature was identified through five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, CCTR and CDSR) and hand searches.
Inclusion criteria: patient-held records in cancer care with the purpose of improving communication and information exchange between and within different levels of care and to promote continuity of care and patients' involvement in their own care.
Data extraction and synthesis: data extraction recorded characteristics of intervention, type of study and factors that contributed to methodological quality of individual studies. Data were then contrasted by setting, objectives, population, study design, outcome measures and changes in outcome, including knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and depression. Methodological quality of randomized control trials and non-experimental studies were assessed with separate standard grading scales.
Main results and conclusions: seven randomized control trials and six non-experimental studies were identified. Evaluations of the PHR have reached equivocal findings. Randomized trials found an absence of effect, non-experimental evaluations shed light on the conditions for its successful use. Most patients welcomed introduction of a PHR. Main problems related to its suitability for different patient groups and the lack of agreement between patients and health professionals regarding its function. Further research is required to determine the conditions under which the PHR can realize its potential as a tool to promote continuity of care and patient participation
cancer, continuity of care, patient involvement, patient-held record, systematic review
75-91
Gysels, Marjolein
54b0973c-096d-422a-94d3-5103431b8b5f
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Higginson, Irene J.
8bff8e06-57f3-491b-ab81-2ecf983f52f3
March 2007
Gysels, Marjolein
54b0973c-096d-422a-94d3-5103431b8b5f
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Higginson, Irene J.
8bff8e06-57f3-491b-ab81-2ecf983f52f3
Gysels, Marjolein, Richardson, Alison and Higginson, Irene J.
(2007)
Does the patient-patient held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review.
Health Expectations, 10 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00415.x).
Abstract
Objectives: to assess the effectiveness of the patient-held record (PHR) in cancer care.
Background: patients with cancer may receive care from different services resulting in gaps. A PHR could provide continuity and patient involvement in care.
Search strategy: relevant literature was identified through five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, CCTR and CDSR) and hand searches.
Inclusion criteria: patient-held records in cancer care with the purpose of improving communication and information exchange between and within different levels of care and to promote continuity of care and patients' involvement in their own care.
Data extraction and synthesis: data extraction recorded characteristics of intervention, type of study and factors that contributed to methodological quality of individual studies. Data were then contrasted by setting, objectives, population, study design, outcome measures and changes in outcome, including knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and depression. Methodological quality of randomized control trials and non-experimental studies were assessed with separate standard grading scales.
Main results and conclusions: seven randomized control trials and six non-experimental studies were identified. Evaluations of the PHR have reached equivocal findings. Randomized trials found an absence of effect, non-experimental evaluations shed light on the conditions for its successful use. Most patients welcomed introduction of a PHR. Main problems related to its suitability for different patient groups and the lack of agreement between patients and health professionals regarding its function. Further research is required to determine the conditions under which the PHR can realize its potential as a tool to promote continuity of care and patient participation
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2007
Keywords:
cancer, continuity of care, patient involvement, patient-held record, systematic review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 69127
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69127
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 309f964e-e0ab-453e-b1c6-18ba8258d2f8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Nov 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marjolein Gysels
Author:
Irene J. Higginson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics