The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Making connections across boundaries: interprofessional learning and communities of practice

Making connections across boundaries: interprofessional learning and communities of practice
Making connections across boundaries: interprofessional learning and communities of practice
Aim: this paper applies Wenger’s (1998) theory of Communities of Practice (CoP) to Interprofessional Learning (IPL). Using findings from a study to evaluate the pedagogy of one Interprofessional Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programme for health, education and social care professionals, we illustrate how IPL can work at the boundaries of a number of distinct agencies to forge links and enhance understanding between them.
Background: CoPs are characterised by ‘mutual engagement’, ‘mutual relationships’, a ‘negotiated enterprise’, ‘shared repertoire’ and boundaries with the rest of the world. Connections can be made between CoPs through the use of ‘boundary encounters’, ‘boundary objects’ and ‘brokering’ (Wenger, 1998). These concepts are significant to IPL and have ramifications for pedagogical design.
Methods: 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted with CPD participants and their line managers.
Results: the CPD provided a forum for boundary encounters between a range of multi-agency professionals. The use of a neutral environment, away from work pressures, was appreciated and encouraged participants to share, question and challenge each other. The pedagogy made extensive use of boundary objects around which discussions could be focused, for example joint presentations. Participants appreciated these as a mechanism through which to engage with interagency colleagues and to step outside professional silos. Brokering was carried out by the course facilitator, who encouraged debate, ensured group focus and responded to requests for additional information. CPD participants were impressed with the informal and responsive style of facilitation. Our findings reinforced the central role of facilitation in IPL, identified by Oandasan and Reeves (2005).
Conclusions: this paper applies a theoretical perspective to the evaluation of IPL, which has increasingly been called for in recent years. Wenger’s framework highlights issues of central relevance to IPL and has assisted us in producing a ‘systematic, disciplined and critical’ analysis. (Barr et al., 2005).
Lees, A.
280a1876-2e23-477f-a770-70d46ff70040
Meyer, E.
f2e4fe13-ba46-43e7-99e1-979cf3983c64
Lees, A.
280a1876-2e23-477f-a770-70d46ff70040
Meyer, E.
f2e4fe13-ba46-43e7-99e1-979cf3983c64

Lees, A. and Meyer, E. (2009) Making connections across boundaries: interprofessional learning and communities of practice. European Interprofessional Education Network (EIPEN) 2nd International Conference, Oulu, Finland. 17 - 18 Sep 2009.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Aim: this paper applies Wenger’s (1998) theory of Communities of Practice (CoP) to Interprofessional Learning (IPL). Using findings from a study to evaluate the pedagogy of one Interprofessional Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programme for health, education and social care professionals, we illustrate how IPL can work at the boundaries of a number of distinct agencies to forge links and enhance understanding between them.
Background: CoPs are characterised by ‘mutual engagement’, ‘mutual relationships’, a ‘negotiated enterprise’, ‘shared repertoire’ and boundaries with the rest of the world. Connections can be made between CoPs through the use of ‘boundary encounters’, ‘boundary objects’ and ‘brokering’ (Wenger, 1998). These concepts are significant to IPL and have ramifications for pedagogical design.
Methods: 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted with CPD participants and their line managers.
Results: the CPD provided a forum for boundary encounters between a range of multi-agency professionals. The use of a neutral environment, away from work pressures, was appreciated and encouraged participants to share, question and challenge each other. The pedagogy made extensive use of boundary objects around which discussions could be focused, for example joint presentations. Participants appreciated these as a mechanism through which to engage with interagency colleagues and to step outside professional silos. Brokering was carried out by the course facilitator, who encouraged debate, ensured group focus and responded to requests for additional information. CPD participants were impressed with the informal and responsive style of facilitation. Our findings reinforced the central role of facilitation in IPL, identified by Oandasan and Reeves (2005).
Conclusions: this paper applies a theoretical perspective to the evaluation of IPL, which has increasingly been called for in recent years. Wenger’s framework highlights issues of central relevance to IPL and has assisted us in producing a ‘systematic, disciplined and critical’ analysis. (Barr et al., 2005).

Text
Microsoft_PowerPoint_-_EIPEN_09.pdf - Other
Download (746kB)

More information

Published date: 17 September 2009
Venue - Dates: European Interprofessional Education Network (EIPEN) 2nd International Conference, Oulu, Finland, 2009-09-17 - 2009-09-18

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69204
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69204
PURE UUID: 056723dc-8a8e-498f-8e72-851a7bd4f693

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Oct 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 19:28

Export record

Contributors

Author: A. Lees
Author: E. Meyer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×