Construct validity of the holistic complementary and alternative
medicines questionnaire (HCAMQ)—an investigation using
modern psychometric approaches
Construct validity of the holistic complementary and alternative
medicines questionnaire (HCAMQ)—an investigation using
modern psychometric approaches
The scientific basis of efficacy studies of complementary medicine requires the availability of validated measures. The Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire
(HCAMQ) is one such measure. This article aimed to examine its construct validity, using a modern psychometric approach. The HCAMQ was completed by 221 patients (mean age 66.8,
SD 8.29, 58% females) with chronic stable pain predominantly from a single joint (hip or knee) of mechanical origin, waiting for a hip (40%) or knee (60%) joint replacement, on enrolment in
a study investigating the effects of acupuncture and placebo controls. The HCAMQ contains a Holistic Health (HH) Subscale (five items) and a CAM subscale (six items). Validity of the
subscales was tested using Cronbach alpha’s, factor analysis, Mokken scaling and Rasch analysis, which did not support the original two-factor structure of the scale. A five-item HH subscale and a four-item CAM subscale (worded in a negative direction) fitted the Rasch model and were unidimensional (chi-square 8.44, P=0.39, PSI=0.69 versus chi-square 17.33,
P=0.03, PSI=0.77). Two CAM items (worded in the positive direction) had significant misfit. In conclusion, we have shown that the original two-factor structure of the HCAMQ could not be supported but that two valid shortened subscales can be used, one for HH Beliefs (four-item HH), and the other for CAM Beliefs (four-item CAM). It is recommended that consideration is given to rewording the two discarded positively worded CAM questions to enhance construct validity
acupuncture, health beliefs, outcomes research, rasch analysis
1-8
Kersten, Paula
039a54d8-5629-47fd-ba55-5b60e7d3e7dc
White, Peter J.
24f5a5d7-00ec-4450-83b8-05d8755e413a
Tennant, A.
fedaadeb-161a-4d26-b2b8-061a42079d7d
2009
Kersten, Paula
039a54d8-5629-47fd-ba55-5b60e7d3e7dc
White, Peter J.
24f5a5d7-00ec-4450-83b8-05d8755e413a
Tennant, A.
fedaadeb-161a-4d26-b2b8-061a42079d7d
Kersten, Paula, White, Peter J. and Tennant, A.
(2009)
Construct validity of the holistic complementary and alternative
medicines questionnaire (HCAMQ)—an investigation using
modern psychometric approaches.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, .
(doi:10.1093/ecam/nep141).
Abstract
The scientific basis of efficacy studies of complementary medicine requires the availability of validated measures. The Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire
(HCAMQ) is one such measure. This article aimed to examine its construct validity, using a modern psychometric approach. The HCAMQ was completed by 221 patients (mean age 66.8,
SD 8.29, 58% females) with chronic stable pain predominantly from a single joint (hip or knee) of mechanical origin, waiting for a hip (40%) or knee (60%) joint replacement, on enrolment in
a study investigating the effects of acupuncture and placebo controls. The HCAMQ contains a Holistic Health (HH) Subscale (five items) and a CAM subscale (six items). Validity of the
subscales was tested using Cronbach alpha’s, factor analysis, Mokken scaling and Rasch analysis, which did not support the original two-factor structure of the scale. A five-item HH subscale and a four-item CAM subscale (worded in a negative direction) fitted the Rasch model and were unidimensional (chi-square 8.44, P=0.39, PSI=0.69 versus chi-square 17.33,
P=0.03, PSI=0.77). Two CAM items (worded in the positive direction) had significant misfit. In conclusion, we have shown that the original two-factor structure of the HCAMQ could not be supported but that two valid shortened subscales can be used, one for HH Beliefs (four-item HH), and the other for CAM Beliefs (four-item CAM). It is recommended that consideration is given to rewording the two discarded positively worded CAM questions to enhance construct validity
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2009
Keywords:
acupuncture, health beliefs, outcomes research, rasch analysis
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 69358
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69358
ISSN: 1741-427X
PURE UUID: e3403d5a-2683-40db-ac2d-fa917ba8585e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Nov 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 19:30
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paula Kersten
Author:
Peter J. White
Author:
A. Tennant
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics