The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Salivary steroid assays - research or routine?

Salivary steroid assays - research or routine?
Salivary steroid assays - research or routine?
Outcome measures need to have an acceptable level of reliability for sound use in clinical and research practice. This study compared the test-re-test reliability of four hand dynamometers measuring grip strength. Using a counterbalanced, repeated measures design, 30 healthy individuals performed three consecutive grip measurements on the MIE digital grip analyser, Baseline Bulb, Jamar® and Lafayette hand dynamometers in a random order on two separate days at the same time. Results indicated that all tools showed a similar and acceptable level of reliability, with a minimum of 90% of the repeat grip data falling within 95% of agreed levels of agreement. The dominant hand showed less variation in grip strength than the non-dominant. Hand pressure was seen to be no less reliable than hand force in a healthy population. Clinicians and researchers can be reassured that the test-re-test reliability of four commonly available dynamometers is acceptable for clinical and research work
0004-5632
183-196
Wood, Peter
9d5d74be-0a73-481e-8c42-ac2e1fe32d12
Wood, Peter
9d5d74be-0a73-481e-8c42-ac2e1fe32d12

Wood, Peter (2009) Salivary steroid assays - research or routine? Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 46 (3), 183-196. (doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008208).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Outcome measures need to have an acceptable level of reliability for sound use in clinical and research practice. This study compared the test-re-test reliability of four hand dynamometers measuring grip strength. Using a counterbalanced, repeated measures design, 30 healthy individuals performed three consecutive grip measurements on the MIE digital grip analyser, Baseline Bulb, Jamar® and Lafayette hand dynamometers in a random order on two separate days at the same time. Results indicated that all tools showed a similar and acceptable level of reliability, with a minimum of 90% of the repeat grip data falling within 95% of agreed levels of agreement. The dominant hand showed less variation in grip strength than the non-dominant. Hand pressure was seen to be no less reliable than hand force in a healthy population. Clinicians and researchers can be reassured that the test-re-test reliability of four commonly available dynamometers is acceptable for clinical and research work

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 May 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69905
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69905
ISSN: 0004-5632
PURE UUID: c45aeef7-415b-446a-aa96-4fb0b0bdd553

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Dec 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 19:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Peter Wood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×