The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol

Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol
Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol
Background: Recognition of people presenting to the general practitioner with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer varies considerably, as do the subsequent patterns of referral and treatment. The Lower Gastrointestinal Electronic Referral Protocol (e-RP) was developed to be used alongside the national Choose and Book programme. This paper addresses the validation of the e-RP.

Methods: The e-RP was validated using three datasets: 100 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, 1002-week wait (TWW) suspected cancer referrals and 100 routine referrals. The actual destination of referred patients, their clinical diagnosis and referral urgency were compared with destination and referral urgency assigned by the e-RP.

Results: Some 43.0 per cent of patients with colorectal. cancer were actually referred through the TWW system and the e-RP successfully upgraded 85.0 per cent of these patients as TWW referrals (Pearson chi(2) = 9.76, 1 d.f., P = 0.002). The e-RP also redirected three of four patients with colorectal cancer in routine referrals to TWW clinics. Right-sided cancers were appropriately directed to colonoscopy as the first contact in secondary care or to outpatients for investigation of a palpable mass. Most patients with left-sided cancers were directed to flexible sigmoidoscopy clinics.

Conclusion: A dedicated referral protocol addressing all colorectal symptoms would significantly improve the overall yield of colorectal cancers through the TWW route and reduce delays in patient pathways with 'straight to test' in secondary care.
secondary, bowel-cancer, population, patients, risk, symptoms, general-practice, treatment, colorectal-cancer, methods, England, cancer, consultation behavior, iron-deficiency anemia, diagnosis, paper, sigmoidoscopy, time, primary-care
506-514
John, S.K.P.
80e7bc75-8bba-425b-825b-c80fbec1ca4f
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Howell, R.D.
6123af96-b5e1-4a9f-aab7-e93da3a2d88e
Primrose, J.N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Fozard, B.J.
98d8934c-e9cf-4450-a576-a1921e98c014
John, S.K.P.
80e7bc75-8bba-425b-825b-c80fbec1ca4f
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Howell, R.D.
6123af96-b5e1-4a9f-aab7-e93da3a2d88e
Primrose, J.N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Fozard, B.J.
98d8934c-e9cf-4450-a576-a1921e98c014

John, S.K.P., George, S., Howell, R.D., Primrose, J.N. and Fozard, B.J. (2008) Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol. British Journal of Surgery, 95 (4), 506-514. (doi:10.1002/bjs.5908).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Recognition of people presenting to the general practitioner with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer varies considerably, as do the subsequent patterns of referral and treatment. The Lower Gastrointestinal Electronic Referral Protocol (e-RP) was developed to be used alongside the national Choose and Book programme. This paper addresses the validation of the e-RP.

Methods: The e-RP was validated using three datasets: 100 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, 1002-week wait (TWW) suspected cancer referrals and 100 routine referrals. The actual destination of referred patients, their clinical diagnosis and referral urgency were compared with destination and referral urgency assigned by the e-RP.

Results: Some 43.0 per cent of patients with colorectal. cancer were actually referred through the TWW system and the e-RP successfully upgraded 85.0 per cent of these patients as TWW referrals (Pearson chi(2) = 9.76, 1 d.f., P = 0.002). The e-RP also redirected three of four patients with colorectal cancer in routine referrals to TWW clinics. Right-sided cancers were appropriately directed to colonoscopy as the first contact in secondary care or to outpatients for investigation of a palpable mass. Most patients with left-sided cancers were directed to flexible sigmoidoscopy clinics.

Conclusion: A dedicated referral protocol addressing all colorectal symptoms would significantly improve the overall yield of colorectal cancers through the TWW route and reduce delays in patient pathways with 'straight to test' in secondary care.

Text
LowerGI_ElectronicReferralProtocol_validationStudy_Mar08.pdf - Author's Original
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (96kB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: April 2008
Keywords: secondary, bowel-cancer, population, patients, risk, symptoms, general-practice, treatment, colorectal-cancer, methods, England, cancer, consultation behavior, iron-deficiency anemia, diagnosis, paper, sigmoidoscopy, time, primary-care
Organisations: Cancer Sciences, Community Clinical Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 70013
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/70013
PURE UUID: c4df51cc-62fa-4f95-8fec-465e821186ce
ORCID for J.N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jan 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S.K.P. John
Author: S. George
Author: R.D. Howell
Author: J.N. Primrose ORCID iD
Author: B.J. Fozard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×