Recognition of skin malignancy by general practitioners: observational study using data from a population-based randomised controlled trial
Recognition of skin malignancy by general practitioners: observational study using data from a population-based randomised controlled trial
Skin malignancy is an important cause of mortality in the United Kingdom and is rising in incidence every year. Most skin cancer presents in primary care, and an important determinant of outcome is initial recognition and management of the lesion. Here we present an observational study of interobserver agreement using data from a population-based randomised controlled trial of minor surgery. Trial participants comprised patients presenting in primary care and needing minor surgery in whom recruiting doctors felt to be able to offer treatment themselves or to be able to refer to a colleague in primary care. They are thus relatively unselected. The skin procedures undertaken in the randomised controlled trial generated 491 lesions with a traceable histology report: 36 lesions (7%) from 33 individuals were malignant or pre-malignant. Chance-corrected agreement (?) between general practitioner (GP) diagnosis of malignancy and histology was 0.45 (0.36–0.54) for lesions and 0.41 (0.32–0.51) for individuals affected with malignancy. Sensitivity of GPs for the detection of malignant lesions was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50.3–79.8) for lesions and 63.6% (95% CI, 46.7–77.8) for individuals affected with malignancy. The safety of patients is of paramount importance and it is unsafe to leave the diagnosis and treatment of potential skin malignancy in the hands of doctors who have limited training and experience. However, the capacity to undertake all of the minor surgical demand works demanded in hospitals does not exist. If the capacity to undertake it is present in primary care, then the increased costs associated with enhanced training for general medical practitioners (GPs) must be borne.
trial, practitioners, recognition, general-practitioners, controlled-trial, controlled trial, skin
24-27
Pockney, P.
6e8b0ca1-e1f6-4780-9d88-ceb7b6eccd84
Primrose, J.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Jayatilleke, N.
ebe7e5fa-587b-4f45-9168-6683ed9d11d0
Leppard, B.
8c78dde1-69bf-46d4-932d-5f26ab41129b
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Kneebone, R.
bead9cdc-cf1e-4513-9f6f-86ddd77f6cd9
Lowy, A.
9e8a8991-e7c8-4e92-96fa-78da83f0f574
13 January 2009
Pockney, P.
6e8b0ca1-e1f6-4780-9d88-ceb7b6eccd84
Primrose, J.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
George, S.
bdfc752b-f67e-4490-8dc0-99bfaeb046ca
Jayatilleke, N.
ebe7e5fa-587b-4f45-9168-6683ed9d11d0
Leppard, B.
8c78dde1-69bf-46d4-932d-5f26ab41129b
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Kneebone, R.
bead9cdc-cf1e-4513-9f6f-86ddd77f6cd9
Lowy, A.
9e8a8991-e7c8-4e92-96fa-78da83f0f574
Pockney, P., Primrose, J., George, S., Jayatilleke, N., Leppard, B., Smith, H., Little, P., Kneebone, R. and Lowy, A.
(2009)
Recognition of skin malignancy by general practitioners: observational study using data from a population-based randomised controlled trial.
British Journal of Cancer, 100 (1), .
(doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604810).
Abstract
Skin malignancy is an important cause of mortality in the United Kingdom and is rising in incidence every year. Most skin cancer presents in primary care, and an important determinant of outcome is initial recognition and management of the lesion. Here we present an observational study of interobserver agreement using data from a population-based randomised controlled trial of minor surgery. Trial participants comprised patients presenting in primary care and needing minor surgery in whom recruiting doctors felt to be able to offer treatment themselves or to be able to refer to a colleague in primary care. They are thus relatively unselected. The skin procedures undertaken in the randomised controlled trial generated 491 lesions with a traceable histology report: 36 lesions (7%) from 33 individuals were malignant or pre-malignant. Chance-corrected agreement (?) between general practitioner (GP) diagnosis of malignancy and histology was 0.45 (0.36–0.54) for lesions and 0.41 (0.32–0.51) for individuals affected with malignancy. Sensitivity of GPs for the detection of malignant lesions was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50.3–79.8) for lesions and 63.6% (95% CI, 46.7–77.8) for individuals affected with malignancy. The safety of patients is of paramount importance and it is unsafe to leave the diagnosis and treatment of potential skin malignancy in the hands of doctors who have limited training and experience. However, the capacity to undertake all of the minor surgical demand works demanded in hospitals does not exist. If the capacity to undertake it is present in primary care, then the increased costs associated with enhanced training for general medical practitioners (GPs) must be borne.
Text
6604810a.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 13 January 2009
Keywords:
trial, practitioners, recognition, general-practitioners, controlled-trial, controlled trial, skin
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 70053
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/70053
ISSN: 0007-0920
PURE UUID: c1debd42-0774-4a24-8c08-25614ac2c351
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2010
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
P. Pockney
Author:
S. George
Author:
N. Jayatilleke
Author:
B. Leppard
Author:
H. Smith
Author:
R. Kneebone
Author:
A. Lowy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
