The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a che-cklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.
0213-9111
144-150
Vol Elm, Erik
06bca604-c1ee-4cf6-9be5-06ee6e7f73c7
Altman, Douglas G.
f0d739a4-dc94-44d1-a497-603a3ed7d7e6
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06
Pocock, Stuart J.
fa0112cd-65f9-46c8-ad4b-9690d30a6fcd
Gøtzsche, Peter C.
a32839e3-ec63-4574-8d06-bfb8572c075c
Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
a7b8f6a3-6d50-4104-8cd7-c4f5568524b0
Vol Elm, Erik
06bca604-c1ee-4cf6-9be5-06ee6e7f73c7
Altman, Douglas G.
f0d739a4-dc94-44d1-a497-603a3ed7d7e6
Egger, Matthias
84a6571b-8728-4b16-89d3-d5dfd207ad06
Pocock, Stuart J.
fa0112cd-65f9-46c8-ad4b-9690d30a6fcd
Gøtzsche, Peter C.
a32839e3-ec63-4574-8d06-bfb8572c075c
Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
a7b8f6a3-6d50-4104-8cd7-c4f5568524b0

Vol Elm, Erik, Altman, Douglas G., Egger, Matthias, Pocock, Stuart J., Gøtzsche, Peter C. and Vandenbroucke, Jan P. (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Gaceta Sanitaria, 22 (2), 144-150.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a che-cklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2008
Additional Information: Artículo Especial - Declaración de la Iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales. Text in Spanish. Article in English available in alternative location link.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 70567
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/70567
ISSN: 0213-9111
PURE UUID: 559dda2d-cdd6-4515-80a0-0e9a0710a60e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2010
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 11:28

Export record

Contributors

Author: Erik Vol Elm
Author: Douglas G. Altman
Author: Matthias Egger
Author: Stuart J. Pocock
Author: Peter C. Gøtzsche
Author: Jan P. Vandenbroucke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×