The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Who receives benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese?

Who receives benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese?
Who receives benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese?
Background To estimate the proportion of and characterize women who had received cervical and breast screening and to quantify the associated preventable burden of disease and potential iatrogenic harm.
Methods A total of 3484 Hong Kong Chinese women were interviewed in person. Screening prevalence and associated predictors, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), the numbers of false-positive tests and the resultant confirmatory procedures and related complications were estimated.
Results A total of 6.2% of women (?18) reported regular pap but no mammography or clinical breast examination (CBE) as per local evidence-based guidelines, whereas among women aged ?40 years, 5.2% reported regular screening by all three modalities and 55.3% had never been screened for either cancer. Women who underwent regular health checkups were consistently the most likely to have been screened, as were younger, married and socially advantaged respondents. Triennial pap screening would save 708 DALYs annually, or 528 more DALYs compared with the status quo. However, this would generate 28 600 repeat smears and 390 colposcopies from false-positive screens. Opportunistic mammographic screening averted 100 DALYs currently, but could have potentially reduced a further 546 with biennial screening. Mass screening mammography (CBE) would lead to 33 700 (20 200) false-positives per year requiring 29 900 (8300) repeat mammograms or ultrasonograms, 6800 (3000) biopsies and 620 (270) biopsy-related complications.
Conclusions Screening uptake patterns are suboptimal. By making explicit the possible risks and benefits based on this template, policy makers in developing Asia with a similar female cancer burden may be able to use the information to make evidence-based decisions that are consistent with local circumstances, values and preferences.
282-292
Leung, Gabriel M.
05520107-4b1b-4adf-a291-20f4d8941219
Woo, Pauline P. S.
fd7c51ba-0b93-4d31-86f2-9fc8291461ef
Cowling, Benjamin J.
0c0bb95a-b3f1-45f7-8c77-abe9bf0ee576
Tsang, Caroline S. H.
91fba4aa-cb2d-40ba-9487-33b5ad74c2b1
Cheung, Annie N. Y.
5934ade1-b70a-4306-b0fe-3b08a8ea8299
Ngan, Hextan Y. S.
40e62c08-0ade-44c4-ba08-4ee41fb8a7b1
Galbraith, Kevin
df577969-60e6-4356-8bd3-03875868912d
Lam, Tai-Hing
d80fce96-6419-48bc-b09f-0a7152c97b83
Leung, Gabriel M.
05520107-4b1b-4adf-a291-20f4d8941219
Woo, Pauline P. S.
fd7c51ba-0b93-4d31-86f2-9fc8291461ef
Cowling, Benjamin J.
0c0bb95a-b3f1-45f7-8c77-abe9bf0ee576
Tsang, Caroline S. H.
91fba4aa-cb2d-40ba-9487-33b5ad74c2b1
Cheung, Annie N. Y.
5934ade1-b70a-4306-b0fe-3b08a8ea8299
Ngan, Hextan Y. S.
40e62c08-0ade-44c4-ba08-4ee41fb8a7b1
Galbraith, Kevin
df577969-60e6-4356-8bd3-03875868912d
Lam, Tai-Hing
d80fce96-6419-48bc-b09f-0a7152c97b83

Leung, Gabriel M., Woo, Pauline P. S., Cowling, Benjamin J., Tsang, Caroline S. H., Cheung, Annie N. Y., Ngan, Hextan Y. S., Galbraith, Kevin and Lam, Tai-Hing (2008) Who receives benefits from and is harmed by cervical and breast cancer screening among Hong Kong Chinese? Journal of Public Health, 30 (3), 282-292. (doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdn034).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background To estimate the proportion of and characterize women who had received cervical and breast screening and to quantify the associated preventable burden of disease and potential iatrogenic harm.
Methods A total of 3484 Hong Kong Chinese women were interviewed in person. Screening prevalence and associated predictors, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), the numbers of false-positive tests and the resultant confirmatory procedures and related complications were estimated.
Results A total of 6.2% of women (?18) reported regular pap but no mammography or clinical breast examination (CBE) as per local evidence-based guidelines, whereas among women aged ?40 years, 5.2% reported regular screening by all three modalities and 55.3% had never been screened for either cancer. Women who underwent regular health checkups were consistently the most likely to have been screened, as were younger, married and socially advantaged respondents. Triennial pap screening would save 708 DALYs annually, or 528 more DALYs compared with the status quo. However, this would generate 28 600 repeat smears and 390 colposcopies from false-positive screens. Opportunistic mammographic screening averted 100 DALYs currently, but could have potentially reduced a further 546 with biennial screening. Mass screening mammography (CBE) would lead to 33 700 (20 200) false-positives per year requiring 29 900 (8300) repeat mammograms or ultrasonograms, 6800 (3000) biopsies and 620 (270) biopsy-related complications.
Conclusions Screening uptake patterns are suboptimal. By making explicit the possible risks and benefits based on this template, policy makers in developing Asia with a similar female cancer burden may be able to use the information to make evidence-based decisions that are consistent with local circumstances, values and preferences.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 70651
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/70651
PURE UUID: d30b835d-60d8-4f0c-9fa3-533c89092901

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Feb 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 20:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gabriel M. Leung
Author: Pauline P. S. Woo
Author: Benjamin J. Cowling
Author: Caroline S. H. Tsang
Author: Annie N. Y. Cheung
Author: Hextan Y. S. Ngan
Author: Kevin Galbraith
Author: Tai-Hing Lam

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×