The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Political cultures compared: the Muhammad cartoons in the Danish and British press

Meer, Nasar and Mouristen, Per (2009) Political cultures compared: the Muhammad cartoons in the Danish and British press Ethnicities, 9, (3), pp. 334-360. (doi:10.1177/1468796809337428).

Record type: Article

Abstract

One outcome of the Muhammad cartoons controversy has been an opportunity for comparative critical examination of public discourse on conceptions of citizenship and belonging vis-à-vis Muslim minorities in different national contexts. In this article, we focus upon the press reaction in two north-western European countries that at first glance promise to offer radically different cases. While Britain is a formerly imperial power where ‘legitimate’ public articulations of the collective ‘we’ must take stock of the sensibilities in this diverse inheritance, Denmark’s emergence as a modern constitutional state is perceived to be premised on a cultural, linguistic and ethnic homogeneity. It would only be fair to anticipate, then, that any comparison of press discourse on matters of religious minority toleration and respect for difference would herald very different outcomes attuned to these traditions. Yet this article shows that, on closer inspection, Jyllands-Posten’s more ‘radical’ approach marked a departure from other Danish newspapers in a manner that left it relatively isolated, and that the self-restraint shown by the British press in not reprinting the cartoons was far from universally supported, and subject to significant internal criticism. Indeed, the press discourse on both countries cast the reaction to the cartoons controversy by Muslims themselves as a sign of failed integration, and each moreover stressed a need for civility and respect – even where there was disagreement over the kinds of ‘dialogue’ that should take place. Nevertheless, significant divergences and cleavages remained, and the explanation for these differences rests not only on Britain’s more ‘multicultural’ traditions, but also the experiences of the Rushdie affair and the subsequent debate that had already taken place in Britain. What is striking is the ways in which the Danish discourse appears to be plotting a course that is not that radically different from one taken in the British case, specifically the extent to which a recognition of religious minority sensibilities needs to be offset with a civic incorporation that is cast in interdependent terms in a way that is inclusive of – and not alienating to – Muslims

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2009
Keywords: cartoons controversy, citizenship, civic status, freedom of speech, muslims, news editorials, public discourse

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 71160
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/71160
ISSN: 1468-7968
PURE UUID: bff841b0-88a3-4ab8-9fff-96bba8c2cc8f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jan 2010
Last modified: 19 Jul 2017 00:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nasar Meer
Author: Per Mouristen

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×