The politics of voluntary and in voluntary identities: are Muslims in Britain an ethnic, racial or religious minority?
The politics of voluntary and in voluntary identities: are Muslims in Britain an ethnic, racial or religious minority?
The denial that racism operates against Muslims qua Muslims has permeated public and media discourse of late. Intellectuals, commentators and legislators from across the political spectrum have explicitly rationalized this
position by distinguishing involuntary racial identities from voluntary religious identities. Meer explores the nature of Muslim identity vis-a`-vis the involuntary and
voluntary dichotomy before examining the consequences of recognizing some ‘racial’ identities in anti-discrimination formulas while ignoring others. This is followed by a short case study of some of the ‘commonsense’ arguments about race
and religion that surrounded the proposed incitement to religious hatred legislation in Britain. The findings suggest that Muslims in Britain are disadvantaged by the
operation of a ‘normative grammar’ of race that materially (in terms of legal instruments) and discursively (in terms of public and media comment) treats their racialization with less seriousness than it does that of other minorities.
anti-discrimination legislation, anti-muslim prejudice, discrimination, ethnicity, islam, islamophobia, muslims, race, racial and religious hatred act, racialization, religion
61-81
Meer, Nasar
0880a73c-7430-4acb-b17e-069fee403aa2
February 2008
Meer, Nasar
0880a73c-7430-4acb-b17e-069fee403aa2
Meer, Nasar
(2008)
The politics of voluntary and in voluntary identities: are Muslims in Britain an ethnic, racial or religious minority?
Patterns of Prejudice, 41 (5), .
(doi:10.1080/00313220701805901).
Abstract
The denial that racism operates against Muslims qua Muslims has permeated public and media discourse of late. Intellectuals, commentators and legislators from across the political spectrum have explicitly rationalized this
position by distinguishing involuntary racial identities from voluntary religious identities. Meer explores the nature of Muslim identity vis-a`-vis the involuntary and
voluntary dichotomy before examining the consequences of recognizing some ‘racial’ identities in anti-discrimination formulas while ignoring others. This is followed by a short case study of some of the ‘commonsense’ arguments about race
and religion that surrounded the proposed incitement to religious hatred legislation in Britain. The findings suggest that Muslims in Britain are disadvantaged by the
operation of a ‘normative grammar’ of race that materially (in terms of legal instruments) and discursively (in terms of public and media comment) treats their racialization with less seriousness than it does that of other minorities.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2008
Keywords:
anti-discrimination legislation, anti-muslim prejudice, discrimination, ethnicity, islam, islamophobia, muslims, race, racial and religious hatred act, racialization, religion
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 71164
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/71164
ISSN: 0031-322X
PURE UUID: 9436e023-a4e6-44f0-a142-326985c827c0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jan 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 20:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nasar Meer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics