'Get off your knees’: print media public intellectuals and Muslims in Britain
'Get off your knees’: print media public intellectuals and Muslims in Britain
This article examines perceptions of British-Muslims deployed by ‘‘print media public intellectuals’’(PMPI). It argues that PMPI embody a particular type of ‘‘mediatized intellectual’’ whose public discourse on Muslims is crucial in determining how issues emerging from the politics of
multiculturalism are understood. Adopting a ‘‘theory of argumentation’’ (Richardson, 2001) derived from a critical discourse analysis methodology (CDA), it investigates the political content of messages disseminated by (1) conservative nationalist and (2) secular liberal PMPI through their newspaper opinion columns. The findings suggest that PMPI argumentation ranges from an overt
hostility to a qualified discrimination (the former through exclusive accounts of belonging and the latter through a combative/civilising liberalism), and that*/moreover*/there is a convergence between these two positions in their anti-Muslim sentiment and desire to regulate the lives of
ethnic Others (Hage, 1998). There are four parts to this article: the first part outlines what a public
intellectual is and where PMPI stand in relation to this; the second part discusses some Muslim attempts to elicit forms of recognition from the state under a rubric of multiculturalism; the third part outlines the chosen CDA schema of analyses and PMPI output; and the fourth part concludes by encouraging us to recognise and examine further the importance of PMPI argumentation in
public discourse
discourse analysis, foucault, journalists, multiculturalism, muslims, print-media, public intellectuals
35-59
Meer, Nasar
0880a73c-7430-4acb-b17e-069fee403aa2
February 2006
Meer, Nasar
0880a73c-7430-4acb-b17e-069fee403aa2
Meer, Nasar
(2006)
'Get off your knees’: print media public intellectuals and Muslims in Britain.
Journalism Studies, 7 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/14616700500450327).
Abstract
This article examines perceptions of British-Muslims deployed by ‘‘print media public intellectuals’’(PMPI). It argues that PMPI embody a particular type of ‘‘mediatized intellectual’’ whose public discourse on Muslims is crucial in determining how issues emerging from the politics of
multiculturalism are understood. Adopting a ‘‘theory of argumentation’’ (Richardson, 2001) derived from a critical discourse analysis methodology (CDA), it investigates the political content of messages disseminated by (1) conservative nationalist and (2) secular liberal PMPI through their newspaper opinion columns. The findings suggest that PMPI argumentation ranges from an overt
hostility to a qualified discrimination (the former through exclusive accounts of belonging and the latter through a combative/civilising liberalism), and that*/moreover*/there is a convergence between these two positions in their anti-Muslim sentiment and desire to regulate the lives of
ethnic Others (Hage, 1998). There are four parts to this article: the first part outlines what a public
intellectual is and where PMPI stand in relation to this; the second part discusses some Muslim attempts to elicit forms of recognition from the state under a rubric of multiculturalism; the third part outlines the chosen CDA schema of analyses and PMPI output; and the fourth part concludes by encouraging us to recognise and examine further the importance of PMPI argumentation in
public discourse
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2006
Keywords:
discourse analysis, foucault, journalists, multiculturalism, muslims, print-media, public intellectuals
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 71167
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/71167
ISSN: 1461-670X
PURE UUID: b4308be3-c281-47d9-93ee-b3f0cea51222
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jan 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 20:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nasar Meer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics