The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear

Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear
Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear
Objectives: This project assessed electroacoustic benefit for speech recognition with a competing talker.
Design: Using a cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in the contralateral ear, the contribution of low-pass and high-pass natural sound to speech recognition was systematically measured.
Results: High-frequency sound did not improve performance, but low-frequency sound did, even when unintelligible and limited to frequencies below 150 Hz.
Conclusions: The low-frequency sound assists separation of the two talkers, presumably using the fundamental frequency cue. Extrapolating this finding to regular cochlear implant users may suggest that using a hearing aid on the contralateral ear will improve performance, even with limited residual hearing.
0196-0202
70-73
Cullington, Helen E.
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Zeng, Fan-Gang
b23758e4-029d-4428-97bf-2613514aac71
Cullington, Helen E.
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Zeng, Fan-Gang
b23758e4-029d-4428-97bf-2613514aac71

Cullington, Helen E. and Zeng, Fan-Gang (2010) Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear. Ear and Hearing, 31 (1), 70-73. (doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bc7722).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: This project assessed electroacoustic benefit for speech recognition with a competing talker.
Design: Using a cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in the contralateral ear, the contribution of low-pass and high-pass natural sound to speech recognition was systematically measured.
Results: High-frequency sound did not improve performance, but low-frequency sound did, even when unintelligible and limited to frequencies below 150 Hz.
Conclusions: The low-frequency sound assists separation of the two talkers, presumably using the fundamental frequency cue. Extrapolating this finding to regular cochlear implant users may suggest that using a hearing aid on the contralateral ear will improve performance, even with limited residual hearing.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2010
Organisations: Institute of Sound & Vibration Research

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 71559
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/71559
ISSN: 0196-0202
PURE UUID: d03ed9f9-e0f7-4f5a-92fe-99a4fb6f0a5a
ORCID for Helen E. Cullington: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-2020

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fan-Gang Zeng

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×