Alienation, servility, and amorality: relating Gogol’s portrayal of bureaupathology to an accountability era
Alienation, servility, and amorality: relating Gogol’s portrayal of bureaupathology to an accountability era
This paper explores the insights literature can bring to administrative and bureaucratic critique, focusing on the work of Nikolai Gogol. Gogol's satire of bureaucracy presages many subsequent social science analyses. These encompass the fundamental ruptures in society caused by a surfeit of bureaucracy in ‘The Nose’ and, on a more psychological level, the effects of bureaucratisation on the individual in ‘The Overcoat’. His stories portray the alienation, futile activity, and servility caused in lower level functionaries through problems of loss of identity, the absence of meaningful work, and a lack of separation between public and private life. This paper uses Gogol's work to intensify and sharpen an exploration of the pathological responses of educational administrators and policy makers to an accountability era of burgeoning bureaucracy that has a profound negative impact on performance.
Educational administration, leadership, bureaucracy, aesthetic critique, bureaupathology
360-373
Samier, Eugenie
f1d5fe15-7a87-4a99-986b-5b866b4017df
12 January 2010
Samier, Eugenie
f1d5fe15-7a87-4a99-986b-5b866b4017df
Samier, Eugenie and Lumby, Jacky
(2010)
Alienation, servility, and amorality: relating Gogol’s portrayal of bureaupathology to an accountability era.
Educational Management and Administration, 38 (3), .
Abstract
This paper explores the insights literature can bring to administrative and bureaucratic critique, focusing on the work of Nikolai Gogol. Gogol's satire of bureaucracy presages many subsequent social science analyses. These encompass the fundamental ruptures in society caused by a surfeit of bureaucracy in ‘The Nose’ and, on a more psychological level, the effects of bureaucratisation on the individual in ‘The Overcoat’. His stories portray the alienation, futile activity, and servility caused in lower level functionaries through problems of loss of identity, the absence of meaningful work, and a lack of separation between public and private life. This paper uses Gogol's work to intensify and sharpen an exploration of the pathological responses of educational administrators and policy makers to an accountability era of burgeoning bureaucracy that has a profound negative impact on performance.
Text
Gogol_Paper_revised2.doc
- Author's Original
More information
Published date: 12 January 2010
Keywords:
Educational administration, leadership, bureaucracy, aesthetic critique, bureaupathology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 71927
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/71927
ISSN: 0263-211X
PURE UUID: 485413ce-e1d4-47df-ab16-bd5b196d04fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jan 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 20:53
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Eugenie Samier
Author:
Jacky Lumby
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics