The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Estimating the storage of anthropogenic carbon in the subtropical Indian Ocean: a comparison of five different approaches

Álvarez, M., Lo Monaco, C., Tanhua, T., Yool, A., Oschlies, A., Bullister, J.L., Goyet, C., Metzl, N., Touratier, F., McDonagh, E. and Bryden, H.L. (2009) Estimating the storage of anthropogenic carbon in the subtropical Indian Ocean: a comparison of five different approaches Biogeosciences, 6, (4), pp. 681-703. (doi:10.5194/bg-6-681-2009).

Record type: Article


The subtropical Indian Ocean along 32° S was for the first time simultaneously sampled in 2002 for inorganic carbon and transient tracers. The vertical distribution and inventory of anthropogenic carbon (CANT) from five different methods: four data-base methods (?C*, TrOCA, TTD and IPSL) and a simulation from the OCCAM model are compared and discussed along with the observed CFC-12 and CCl4 distributions. In the surface layer, where carbon-based methods are uncertain, TTD and OCCAM yield the same result (7±0.2 molC m?2), helping to specify the surface CANT inventory. Below the mixed-layer, the comparison suggests that CANT penetrates deeper and more uniformly into the Antarctic Intermediate Water layer limit than estimated from the much utilized ?C* method. Significant CFC-12 and CCl4 values are detected in bottom waters, associated with Antarctic Bottom Water. In this layer, except for ?C* and OCCAM, the other methods detect significant CANT values. Consequently, the lowest inventory is calculated using the ?C* method (24±2 molC m?2) or OCCAM (24.4±2.8 molC m?2) while TrOCA, TTD, and IPSL lead to higher inventories (28.1±2.2, 28.9±2.3 and 30.8±2.5 molC m?2 respectively). Overall and despite the uncertainties each method is evaluated using its relationship with tracers and the knowledge about water masses in the subtropical Indian Ocean. Along 32° S our best estimate for the mean CANT specific inventory is 28±2 molC m?2. Comparison exercises for data-based CANT methods along with time-series or repeat sections analysis should help to identify strengths and caveats in the CANT methods and to better constrain model simulations

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2009


Local EPrints ID: 71936
ISSN: 1726-4170
PURE UUID: 9511e57f-3288-45d7-8094-03694af0f640
ORCID for H.L. Bryden: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jan 2010
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:57

Export record



Author: M. Álvarez
Author: C. Lo Monaco
Author: T. Tanhua
Author: A. Yool
Author: A. Oschlies
Author: J.L. Bullister
Author: C. Goyet
Author: N. Metzl
Author: F. Touratier
Author: E. McDonagh
Author: H.L. Bryden ORCID iD

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.