The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study

A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study
Background

Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders’ perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness. This paper reports findings from the first known study to compare the cost and clinical impact of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing to independent medical prescribing.

Methods

A post-test control group experimental design was used to compare the treatment costs, clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing with a matched group of patients in receipt of independent prescribing from consultant psychiatrists. The sample comprised 45 patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing for a minimum of six months and a matched group (by age, gender, diagnosis, and chronicity) of patients prescribed for by psychiatrists.

Results

There were no significant differences between patients in the nurse supplementary prescribers’ group and the independent prescribers’ group in terms of medication adherence, health status, side effects, and satisfaction with overall care. Total costs per patient for service use were £803 higher for the nurse prescribers’ group but this difference was not significant (95% confidence interval -£1341 to £3020).

Conclusions

No significant differences were found between the health and social outcomes of patients in the mental health nurse supplementary prescribers’ group, and those prescribed for by the independent medical prescribers. The cost appraisal also showed that there was no significant difference in the costs of the two types of prescribing, although the pattern of resources used differed between patients in the two prescriber groups. The results suggest that mental health nurse supplementary prescribers can deliver similar health benefits to patients as consultant psychiatrists without any significant difference in patients’ service utilisation costs.
nurse prescribing, mental health, evaluation
1472-6963
Norman, Ian J.
7842286f-d953-48f7-9d11-bfe1b492086c
Coster, Samantha
fa78e9ae-497c-4d05-acb3-26337f4f3807
McCrone, Paul
ce0c78b3-8fba-43ff-b305-e331c00cb9f9
Sibley, Andrew
afe7cc9d-614e-4cb1-b080-8ca7df54ae40
Whittlesea, Cate
8ef0d926-92df-41b7-8a54-72f8a9a7c051
Norman, Ian J.
7842286f-d953-48f7-9d11-bfe1b492086c
Coster, Samantha
fa78e9ae-497c-4d05-acb3-26337f4f3807
McCrone, Paul
ce0c78b3-8fba-43ff-b305-e331c00cb9f9
Sibley, Andrew
afe7cc9d-614e-4cb1-b080-8ca7df54ae40
Whittlesea, Cate
8ef0d926-92df-41b7-8a54-72f8a9a7c051

Norman, Ian J., Coster, Samantha, McCrone, Paul, Sibley, Andrew and Whittlesea, Cate (2010) A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study. BMC Health Services Research, 10 (4). (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-4). (PMID:20051131)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Supplementary prescribing for mental health nurses was first introduced in the UK in 2003. Since then, a number of studies have reported stakeholders’ perceptions of the success of the initiative. However, there has been little experimental research conducted into its effectiveness. This paper reports findings from the first known study to compare the cost and clinical impact of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing to independent medical prescribing.

Methods

A post-test control group experimental design was used to compare the treatment costs, clinical outcomes and satisfaction of patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing with a matched group of patients in receipt of independent prescribing from consultant psychiatrists. The sample comprised 45 patients in receipt of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing for a minimum of six months and a matched group (by age, gender, diagnosis, and chronicity) of patients prescribed for by psychiatrists.

Results

There were no significant differences between patients in the nurse supplementary prescribers’ group and the independent prescribers’ group in terms of medication adherence, health status, side effects, and satisfaction with overall care. Total costs per patient for service use were £803 higher for the nurse prescribers’ group but this difference was not significant (95% confidence interval -£1341 to £3020).

Conclusions

No significant differences were found between the health and social outcomes of patients in the mental health nurse supplementary prescribers’ group, and those prescribed for by the independent medical prescribers. The cost appraisal also showed that there was no significant difference in the costs of the two types of prescribing, although the pattern of resources used differed between patients in the two prescriber groups. The results suggest that mental health nurse supplementary prescribers can deliver similar health benefits to patients as consultant psychiatrists without any significant difference in patients’ service utilisation costs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 January 2010
Keywords: nurse prescribing, mental health, evaluation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 72272
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/72272
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: 74d97d85-b1e5-4058-8445-154046bf5b0e
ORCID for Andrew Sibley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-5432

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Feb 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 21:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ian J. Norman
Author: Samantha Coster
Author: Paul McCrone
Author: Andrew Sibley ORCID iD
Author: Cate Whittlesea

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×