Pre-registration interprofessional education: an evaluative study using podiatry as an exemplar
Pre-registration interprofessional education: an evaluative study using podiatry as an exemplar
The ability to learn and work in a multidisciplinary team is crucial to the delivery of healthcare that is ‘fit for purpose’ in the twenty-first century. Consequently, interprofessional education (IPE) is a mandatory requirement for pre-registration training in health and social care. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of such programmes remains limited. This evaluative study aims to explore the potential influence of IPE at pre-registration level, using podiatry as an exemplar.
In Phase One, key informant interviews were held with IPE curriculum developers from higher education institutions (HEIs) (n=8) in the United Kingdom. Verbatim transcripts of these interviews were analysed using elements of grounded theory. In Phase Two, using the qualitative results as the anchor, a survey was constructed and administered to pre-registration health and social work students in a number of parallel IPE initiatives (Sample 1: n=1151; Sample 2: n=1060), involving 6 and 5 HEIs respectively. The findings of the key informant interviews and SPSS survey analysis were subsequently combined to inform the results of the research.
The findings revealed an absence of educational theory underpinning the IPE curriculum development process. In addition there were issues concerning institutional commitment to IPE, attitudes towards IPE, and inconsistencies in the approach to curriculum delivery, all of which militated against successful implementation. The results illuminated that students learn about other health and social care professions that are represented in their IPE group. An appropriate time to introduce IPE into pre-registration programmes was found to be the latter part of the academic year for students studying first year modules. Students’ readiness for interprofessional learning was found to be enhanced if they were inducted to a coherent IPE initiative with consistent approaches to learning, teaching, assessment and evaluation across programmes. However, attitude differences between professional groups emerged where students with a strong sense of professional identity and roles were less ready to engage in interprofessional learning.
This study indicates that the current method of implementing IPE in pre-registration health and social care programmes is less than ideal. The development and delivery of the IPE curriculum appears to be flawed. Explanations for the findings are explored and the implications for practice and future research are considered.
multiprofessional education, pre-qualifying, program evaluation, interdisciplinary education
Craddock, Deborah
b138fdce-ecfb-4cf0-a481-d2fc209a1eff
January 2010
Craddock, Deborah
b138fdce-ecfb-4cf0-a481-d2fc209a1eff
O’Halloran, Cath
cb04159e-8a21-4389-9867-852ec6038724
Borthwick, Alan
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
McPherson, Kath
5926c131-e68f-46f2-9ec3-70c2c4965d45
Craddock, Deborah
(2010)
Pre-registration interprofessional education: an evaluative study using podiatry as an exemplar.
University of Southampton, School of Health Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, 363pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
The ability to learn and work in a multidisciplinary team is crucial to the delivery of healthcare that is ‘fit for purpose’ in the twenty-first century. Consequently, interprofessional education (IPE) is a mandatory requirement for pre-registration training in health and social care. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of such programmes remains limited. This evaluative study aims to explore the potential influence of IPE at pre-registration level, using podiatry as an exemplar.
In Phase One, key informant interviews were held with IPE curriculum developers from higher education institutions (HEIs) (n=8) in the United Kingdom. Verbatim transcripts of these interviews were analysed using elements of grounded theory. In Phase Two, using the qualitative results as the anchor, a survey was constructed and administered to pre-registration health and social work students in a number of parallel IPE initiatives (Sample 1: n=1151; Sample 2: n=1060), involving 6 and 5 HEIs respectively. The findings of the key informant interviews and SPSS survey analysis were subsequently combined to inform the results of the research.
The findings revealed an absence of educational theory underpinning the IPE curriculum development process. In addition there were issues concerning institutional commitment to IPE, attitudes towards IPE, and inconsistencies in the approach to curriculum delivery, all of which militated against successful implementation. The results illuminated that students learn about other health and social care professions that are represented in their IPE group. An appropriate time to introduce IPE into pre-registration programmes was found to be the latter part of the academic year for students studying first year modules. Students’ readiness for interprofessional learning was found to be enhanced if they were inducted to a coherent IPE initiative with consistent approaches to learning, teaching, assessment and evaluation across programmes. However, attitude differences between professional groups emerged where students with a strong sense of professional identity and roles were less ready to engage in interprofessional learning.
This study indicates that the current method of implementing IPE in pre-registration health and social care programmes is less than ideal. The development and delivery of the IPE curriculum appears to be flawed. Explanations for the findings are explored and the implications for practice and future research are considered.
Text
PhD_Thesis_January_2010_FINAL_Deborah_Craddock.pdf
- Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: January 2010
Keywords:
multiprofessional education, pre-qualifying, program evaluation, interdisciplinary education
Organisations:
University of Southampton
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 72411
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/72411
PURE UUID: eb0a2ce5-afde-4b4a-913d-c00a2b98c5ff
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Feb 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 21:30
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Deborah Craddock
Thesis advisor:
Cath O’Halloran
Thesis advisor:
Alan Borthwick
Thesis advisor:
Kath McPherson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics