The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Social class and census based deprivation scores:which is the best predictor of stillbirth rates?

Joyce, R., Webb, R. and Peacock, J.L. (1999) Social class and census based deprivation scores:which is the best predictor of stillbirth rates? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 13, (3), pp. 269-277. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00188.x).

Record type: Article


This study investigates whether social class or a census-based deprivation score is a better predictor of stillbirth rates using data for 1993–5 for residents of South Thames (West) Region. Social class is routinely coded for 10% of live births and 100% of stillbirths. A Townsend deprivation score was assigned to each stillbirth and each live birth with a social class code, according to their electoral ward of residence. In unifactorial analyses of stillbirth rate the relationship was stronger with social class (P = 0.008) than with Townsend score (P = 0.11). Both relationships were strengthened by including those births recorded as social class 'other'['other' vs. social class I odds ratio (OR) = 2.27, P < 0.001; lower vs. upper septile deprivation score OR = 1.45, P = 0.07)]. When social class and Townsend score were analysed together, the ORs for social class remained similar to before, but the Townsend ORs were reduced and non-significant overall. We conclude that social class, which is based on data on each individual, is a better predictor of stillbirth than Townsend score, which is based on data from the area of residence. We recommend further investigation of the stillbirth risk in the subgroups that make up the 'other' social class.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1999


Local EPrints ID: 72826
ISSN: 0269-5022
PURE UUID: b366b540-6e86-475c-84ee-b79357537079

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2010
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:52

Export record



Author: R. Joyce
Author: R. Webb
Author: J.L. Peacock

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.