The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Maternal cotinine level during pregnancy and birthweight for gestational age

Maternal cotinine level during pregnancy and birthweight for gestational age
Maternal cotinine level during pregnancy and birthweight for gestational age
Background
Recent studies have found that cotinine is a better predictor of birthweight than the number of cigarettes smoked in pregnancy. In this paper we test this hypothesis and use cotinine to explore the effect of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) on birthweight.
Methods
In all, 1254 white women were interviewed at booking, 28 and 36 weeks about the number and brand of cigarette smoked. Cotinine was assayed from blood samples taken on the day of interview. The outcome was birthweight for gestational age.
Results
There was good agreement between self-reported smoker/non-smoker status and maternal cotinine with 1.3% women mis-reported as non-smokers at booking, 0.6% and 1.8% mis-reported at 28 and 36 weeks respectively. Among smokers, cotinine was more closely related to birthweight than the number of cigarettes smoked at all three time points (r = -0.25 versus r = -0.16 at booking). A reduction in cotinine between booking and 28 weeks was associated with increased birthweight but the effect was not statistically significant. Among non-smokers the association between birthweight and cotinine was not statistically significant after adjusting for maternal height, parity, sex and gestational age. Difference in mean birthweight between non-smokers in the lower and upper quintiles of cotinine was 0.2% (95% CI: -2.4, 2.8). Pooling the results of 10 studies plus our own gave an estimated difference in mean birthweight between women unexposed and exposed to passive smoke of 31 g (95% CI: 19, 44).
Conclusions
Cotinine is a better predictor of birthweight than the reported number of cigarettes smoked. If biochemical analysis is impossible, then self-reported smoking habit should be obtained prospectively using a structured approach. Any effect on birthweight of maternal passive smoking during pregnancy is small compared with the effects of maternal active smoking.
0300-5771
647-656
Peacock, Janet L.
1cb1242c-7606-4f8e-86d0-d3cd2ceff782
Cook, Derek G.
0e13cfdc-c3f8-4f3f-834a-858c2a0c34cc
Carey, Iain M.
3597baa1-6404-4f08-8d4b-a9350c876496
Jarvis, Martin J.
04dbbdd2-8f3c-4346-b04c-81c2f6f391a6
Bryant, Andrew E.
4e3dc8d8-3423-4f5e-8c6e-7be14c636fb1
Anderson, H. Ross
2197f0c6-7670-4e83-b6d3-1233ac58f7db
Bland, J. Martin
65bca4e9-0ceb-44f4-b5ac-3ff5e0b5945c
Peacock, Janet L.
1cb1242c-7606-4f8e-86d0-d3cd2ceff782
Cook, Derek G.
0e13cfdc-c3f8-4f3f-834a-858c2a0c34cc
Carey, Iain M.
3597baa1-6404-4f08-8d4b-a9350c876496
Jarvis, Martin J.
04dbbdd2-8f3c-4346-b04c-81c2f6f391a6
Bryant, Andrew E.
4e3dc8d8-3423-4f5e-8c6e-7be14c636fb1
Anderson, H. Ross
2197f0c6-7670-4e83-b6d3-1233ac58f7db
Bland, J. Martin
65bca4e9-0ceb-44f4-b5ac-3ff5e0b5945c

Peacock, Janet L., Cook, Derek G., Carey, Iain M., Jarvis, Martin J., Bryant, Andrew E., Anderson, H. Ross and Bland, J. Martin (1998) Maternal cotinine level during pregnancy and birthweight for gestational age. International Journal of Epidemiology, 27 (4), 647-656.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Recent studies have found that cotinine is a better predictor of birthweight than the number of cigarettes smoked in pregnancy. In this paper we test this hypothesis and use cotinine to explore the effect of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) on birthweight.
Methods
In all, 1254 white women were interviewed at booking, 28 and 36 weeks about the number and brand of cigarette smoked. Cotinine was assayed from blood samples taken on the day of interview. The outcome was birthweight for gestational age.
Results
There was good agreement between self-reported smoker/non-smoker status and maternal cotinine with 1.3% women mis-reported as non-smokers at booking, 0.6% and 1.8% mis-reported at 28 and 36 weeks respectively. Among smokers, cotinine was more closely related to birthweight than the number of cigarettes smoked at all three time points (r = -0.25 versus r = -0.16 at booking). A reduction in cotinine between booking and 28 weeks was associated with increased birthweight but the effect was not statistically significant. Among non-smokers the association between birthweight and cotinine was not statistically significant after adjusting for maternal height, parity, sex and gestational age. Difference in mean birthweight between non-smokers in the lower and upper quintiles of cotinine was 0.2% (95% CI: -2.4, 2.8). Pooling the results of 10 studies plus our own gave an estimated difference in mean birthweight between women unexposed and exposed to passive smoke of 31 g (95% CI: 19, 44).
Conclusions
Cotinine is a better predictor of birthweight than the reported number of cigarettes smoked. If biochemical analysis is impossible, then self-reported smoking habit should be obtained prospectively using a structured approach. Any effect on birthweight of maternal passive smoking during pregnancy is small compared with the effects of maternal active smoking.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 15 December 1997
Published date: 1998

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 72833
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/72833
ISSN: 0300-5771
PURE UUID: d55d6abd-82a3-4592-8a7c-791bff853b4e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Mar 2010
Last modified: 07 Jan 2022 20:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: Janet L. Peacock
Author: Derek G. Cook
Author: Iain M. Carey
Author: Martin J. Jarvis
Author: Andrew E. Bryant
Author: H. Ross Anderson
Author: J. Martin Bland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×