The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search

High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search
High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search
Previous studies have demonstrated a dual-target cost in visual search. In the current study, the relationship between search for one and search for two targets was investigated to examine the effects of target prevalence and practice. Color-shape conjunction stimuli were used with response time, accuracy and signal detection measures. Performance was lower in dual-target search compared with the combined performance for two independent single-target searches. The cost in response time slope disappeared with practice, but the cost in accuracy remained. Sensitivity was lower and the decision criterion more conservative in dual-target search than in single-target searches, suggesting that the representation of the target was less effective in dual-target search than in single-target search. Manipulation of target prevalence induced a bias in favor of the more likely correct response: target-present responses were likely under high target prevalence and target-absent responses were likely under low target prevalence. The prevalence effect was greater in dual-target search than single-target search, causing the dual-target cost to be larger under target prevalences that differed from 50%. These findings are important for applied tasks in which targets appear rarely and can differ from each other. For example, the low target prevalence in X-ray security searches may magnify the dual-target cost implicated in previous research with X-ray images (see Menneer, Cave, & Donnelly, 2009). Such a result would increase the need for security personnel to consider alternatives to dual-target search, such as specialization in detecting one target type or training to encourage independent searches for each target.
Dual-target search, prevalence effect, visual search, target representation, security screening.
1076-898X
133-144
Menneer, T
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Donnelly, N
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Godwin, H. J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Cave, K. R.
92995673-7566-4ddd-89db-3e2ecb12c713
Menneer, T
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Donnelly, N
05c83b6b-ee8d-4c9d-85dc-c5dcd6b5427b
Godwin, H. J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Cave, K. R.
92995673-7566-4ddd-89db-3e2ecb12c713

Menneer, T, Donnelly, N, Godwin, H. J. and Cave, K. R. (2010) High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16 (2), 133-144. (doi:10.1037/a0019569).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a dual-target cost in visual search. In the current study, the relationship between search for one and search for two targets was investigated to examine the effects of target prevalence and practice. Color-shape conjunction stimuli were used with response time, accuracy and signal detection measures. Performance was lower in dual-target search compared with the combined performance for two independent single-target searches. The cost in response time slope disappeared with practice, but the cost in accuracy remained. Sensitivity was lower and the decision criterion more conservative in dual-target search than in single-target searches, suggesting that the representation of the target was less effective in dual-target search than in single-target search. Manipulation of target prevalence induced a bias in favor of the more likely correct response: target-present responses were likely under high target prevalence and target-absent responses were likely under low target prevalence. The prevalence effect was greater in dual-target search than single-target search, causing the dual-target cost to be larger under target prevalences that differed from 50%. These findings are important for applied tasks in which targets appear rarely and can differ from each other. For example, the low target prevalence in X-ray security searches may magnify the dual-target cost implicated in previous research with X-ray images (see Menneer, Cave, & Donnelly, 2009). Such a result would increase the need for security personnel to consider alternatives to dual-target search, such as specialization in detecting one target type or training to encourage independent searches for each target.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010
Keywords: Dual-target search, prevalence effect, visual search, target representation, security screening.
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73170
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73170
ISSN: 1076-898X
PURE UUID: 2d767afa-300e-4657-a11f-5602eb2eff21
ORCID for H. J. Godwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-1232-500X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T Menneer
Author: N Donnelly
Author: H. J. Godwin ORCID iD
Author: K. R. Cave

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×