The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay?

Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay?
Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay?
A dearth of clinical research involving children has resulted in off-licence and sometimes inappropriate medications being prescribed to the paediatric population. In this environment, recent years have seen the introduction of a raft of regulation aimed at increasing the involvement of children in clinical trials research and generating evidence-based medicinal preparations for their use. However, this regulation pays scant attention to the autonomy of competent minors. In particular, it makes no provision for the ability of competent minors to consent to participate in medical research and is therefore at odds with best ethical practice. This article explores the tensions between law and ethics in relation to clinical research involving minors and concludes that greater respect should be given to the autonomy of those minors who are competent to decide for themselves.
1477-7509
176-180
Biggs, Hazel
d0d08de6-6cae-4679-964c-eac653d7722b
Biggs, Hazel
d0d08de6-6cae-4679-964c-eac653d7722b

Biggs, Hazel (2009) Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay? Clinical Ethics, 4 (4), 176-180. (doi:10.1258/ce.2009.009026). (Submitted)

Record type: Article

Abstract

A dearth of clinical research involving children has resulted in off-licence and sometimes inappropriate medications being prescribed to the paediatric population. In this environment, recent years have seen the introduction of a raft of regulation aimed at increasing the involvement of children in clinical trials research and generating evidence-based medicinal preparations for their use. However, this regulation pays scant attention to the autonomy of competent minors. In particular, it makes no provision for the ability of competent minors to consent to participate in medical research and is therefore at odds with best ethical practice. This article explores the tensions between law and ethics in relation to clinical research involving minors and concludes that greater respect should be given to the autonomy of those minors who are competent to decide for themselves.

Text
Microsoft_Word_-_Clinical_Ethics_-_children_and_consent_eprint_version.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (160kB)

More information

Submitted date: 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73514
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73514
ISSN: 1477-7509
PURE UUID: e76e4292-7a61-4503-a86e-adcb4b40816f
ORCID for Hazel Biggs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-6543

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Hazel Biggs ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×