The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Randomised comparison of the Stanford V regimen and ABVD in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244

Randomised comparison of the Stanford V regimen and ABVD in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244
Randomised comparison of the Stanford V regimen and ABVD in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244
Purpose: this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

Patients and methods: patients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (> 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm.

Results: the overall response rates after completion of all treatment were 91% for Stanford V and 92% for ABVD. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, there was no evidence of a difference in projected 5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates (76% and 90%, respectively, for ABVD; 74% and 92%, respectively, for Stanford V). More pulmonary toxicity was reported for ABVD, whereas other toxicities were more frequent with Stanford V.

Conclusion: in a large, randomized trial, the efficacies of Stanford V and ABVD were comparable when given in combination with appropriate radiotherapy.

1527-7755
5390-5396
Hoskin, Peter J.
93234810-cf18-4663-8b13-bc0025823f21
Lowry, Lisa
cf543283-8834-49bb-8f02-89dcc525a627
Horwich, Alan
916dc405-a256-4510-9a0e-8c047a03fda0
Jack, Andrew
d5359586-e37e-4f31-8c2a-b15959a43d4c
Mead, Ben
d6cf838c-8013-420f-9ab4-35a32608843e
Hancock, Barry W.
240a7ccb-edc3-4194-9325-a5c3b1d6d593
Smith, Paul
5971135c-98d0-47e0-9f40-94085befbd20
Qian, Wendi
a8585d5c-948a-44a1-b5ef-82e7d21b05f5
Patrick, Philippa
9b24b390-81f5-42e9-9cbc-1b64c7809ebb
Popova, Bilyana
2d2389df-3117-48e1-8f76-85d0a5df3410
Pettitt, Andrew
fb9da802-0ff6-420d-8805-0efb461f823d
Cunningham, David
c40c8fe4-7eac-4b98-aaa5-b866da1e32ab
Pettengell, Ruth
28ecc9df-584b-4a52-b6e6-c8e9228d421b
Sweetenham, John
0068e2d0-930b-4c08-97b8-ca6cc0a3f5a7
Linch, David
0ac602f1-c036-40aa-b554-d8a204abe425
Johnson, Peter W.M.
3f6068ce-171e-4c2c-aca9-dc9b6a37413f
Hoskin, Peter J.
93234810-cf18-4663-8b13-bc0025823f21
Lowry, Lisa
cf543283-8834-49bb-8f02-89dcc525a627
Horwich, Alan
916dc405-a256-4510-9a0e-8c047a03fda0
Jack, Andrew
d5359586-e37e-4f31-8c2a-b15959a43d4c
Mead, Ben
d6cf838c-8013-420f-9ab4-35a32608843e
Hancock, Barry W.
240a7ccb-edc3-4194-9325-a5c3b1d6d593
Smith, Paul
5971135c-98d0-47e0-9f40-94085befbd20
Qian, Wendi
a8585d5c-948a-44a1-b5ef-82e7d21b05f5
Patrick, Philippa
9b24b390-81f5-42e9-9cbc-1b64c7809ebb
Popova, Bilyana
2d2389df-3117-48e1-8f76-85d0a5df3410
Pettitt, Andrew
fb9da802-0ff6-420d-8805-0efb461f823d
Cunningham, David
c40c8fe4-7eac-4b98-aaa5-b866da1e32ab
Pettengell, Ruth
28ecc9df-584b-4a52-b6e6-c8e9228d421b
Sweetenham, John
0068e2d0-930b-4c08-97b8-ca6cc0a3f5a7
Linch, David
0ac602f1-c036-40aa-b554-d8a204abe425
Johnson, Peter W.M.
3f6068ce-171e-4c2c-aca9-dc9b6a37413f

Hoskin, Peter J., Lowry, Lisa, Horwich, Alan, Jack, Andrew, Mead, Ben, Hancock, Barry W., Smith, Paul, Qian, Wendi, Patrick, Philippa, Popova, Bilyana, Pettitt, Andrew, Cunningham, David, Pettengell, Ruth, Sweetenham, John, Linch, David and Johnson, Peter W.M. (2009) Randomised comparison of the Stanford V regimen and ABVD in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Lymphoma Group Study ISRCTN 64141244. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27 (32), 5390-5396. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3239).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL): the weekly alternating Stanford V and the standard, twice-weekly regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

Patients and methods: patients had stage IIB, III, or IV disease or had stages I to IIA disease with bulky disease or other adverse features. Radiotherapy was administered in both arms to sites of previous bulk (> 5 cm) and to splenic deposits, although this was omitted in the latter part of the trial for patients achieving complete remission (CR) in the ABVD arm. A total of 520 patients were randomly assigned and were assessed for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival (PFS). Five hundred patients received protocol treatment, and radiotherapy was administered to 73% in the Stanford V arm and to 53% in the ABVD arm.

Results: the overall response rates after completion of all treatment were 91% for Stanford V and 92% for ABVD. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, there was no evidence of a difference in projected 5-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates (76% and 90%, respectively, for ABVD; 74% and 92%, respectively, for Stanford V). More pulmonary toxicity was reported for ABVD, whereas other toxicities were more frequent with Stanford V.

Conclusion: in a large, randomized trial, the efficacies of Stanford V and ABVD were comparable when given in combination with appropriate radiotherapy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 8 September 2009
Published date: 10 November 2009
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73516
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73516
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: e76228e8-3c22-4c7b-8718-9f40ea266d3f
ORCID for Peter W.M. Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-4974

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Peter J. Hoskin
Author: Lisa Lowry
Author: Alan Horwich
Author: Andrew Jack
Author: Ben Mead
Author: Barry W. Hancock
Author: Paul Smith
Author: Wendi Qian
Author: Philippa Patrick
Author: Bilyana Popova
Author: Andrew Pettitt
Author: David Cunningham
Author: Ruth Pettengell
Author: John Sweetenham
Author: David Linch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×