The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact of positive and negative spiritual experiences on distress and the moderating role of mindfulness

The impact of positive and negative spiritual experiences on distress and the moderating role of mindfulness
The impact of positive and negative spiritual experiences on distress and the moderating role of mindfulness
Both spiritual experiences and mindfulness as a psychological variable have been identified as components of wellbeing and health. As there is uncertainty about their relationship, we have investigated the impact of spiritual experiences and mindfulness as well as their interaction on distress in chronically ill patients.
The unidimensional Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale (DSES), the multidimensional Exceptional Experiences Questionnaire (EEQ), the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were administered to 109 chronically ill patients. Fifty-eight patients (53%) reported regular and frequent spiritual or contemplative practice from different traditions over an average of 14.7 years (SD = 13.7). Patients with regular spiritual practice reported more positive spiritual experiences, were more mindful and less distressed (p < .001).
A stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that the EEQ subscale “negative spiritual experiences” (NSE) was the most important single predictor for psychological distress (R2=.38; ?=.63). In contrast, both the EEQ subscale “positive spiritual experiences” as well as the DSES that also captures positives daily encounters with a transcendental realm or entity did not account for a significant amount of variance in distress. Further analysis of the regression model (R2=.57), confirmed that NSE was still the largest predictor for distress (?=.61) and that mindfulness (?=-.38) and the interaction between mindfulness and NSE (?=-.23) were the most important buffers protecting individuals from distress. Thus, mindfulness seems not only to be a clinically important protective factor for buffering generic distress, but particularly for distress derived from NSEs.
This suggests that in addition to directly facilitating well-being and health by means of positive spiritual experiences, at least some form of regular spiritual or meditative techniques seem to endow an individual with a certain degree of resilience against negative spiritual experiences that is likely a consequence of increased mindfulness. If these findings are vindicated by further studies, spiritual experiences should not be conceived and measured as univariate but rather multivariate constructs.
spirituality, mindfulness, spiritual experiences, distress
0084-6724
357-374
Kohls, Niko
b0b7fdf1-8ca9-4d9f-878b-322f402b4b1d
Walach, Harald
b6c1f873-105c-4825-9b9b-2a3cf9dc4fb2
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Kohls, Niko
b0b7fdf1-8ca9-4d9f-878b-322f402b4b1d
Walach, Harald
b6c1f873-105c-4825-9b9b-2a3cf9dc4fb2
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625

Kohls, Niko, Walach, Harald and Lewith, George (2009) The impact of positive and negative spiritual experiences on distress and the moderating role of mindfulness. Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie, 31 (3), 357-374. (doi:10.1163/008467209X12524724282032).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Both spiritual experiences and mindfulness as a psychological variable have been identified as components of wellbeing and health. As there is uncertainty about their relationship, we have investigated the impact of spiritual experiences and mindfulness as well as their interaction on distress in chronically ill patients.
The unidimensional Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale (DSES), the multidimensional Exceptional Experiences Questionnaire (EEQ), the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were administered to 109 chronically ill patients. Fifty-eight patients (53%) reported regular and frequent spiritual or contemplative practice from different traditions over an average of 14.7 years (SD = 13.7). Patients with regular spiritual practice reported more positive spiritual experiences, were more mindful and less distressed (p < .001).
A stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that the EEQ subscale “negative spiritual experiences” (NSE) was the most important single predictor for psychological distress (R2=.38; ?=.63). In contrast, both the EEQ subscale “positive spiritual experiences” as well as the DSES that also captures positives daily encounters with a transcendental realm or entity did not account for a significant amount of variance in distress. Further analysis of the regression model (R2=.57), confirmed that NSE was still the largest predictor for distress (?=.61) and that mindfulness (?=-.38) and the interaction between mindfulness and NSE (?=-.23) were the most important buffers protecting individuals from distress. Thus, mindfulness seems not only to be a clinically important protective factor for buffering generic distress, but particularly for distress derived from NSEs.
This suggests that in addition to directly facilitating well-being and health by means of positive spiritual experiences, at least some form of regular spiritual or meditative techniques seem to endow an individual with a certain degree of resilience against negative spiritual experiences that is likely a consequence of increased mindfulness. If these findings are vindicated by further studies, spiritual experiences should not be conceived and measured as univariate but rather multivariate constructs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009
Keywords: spirituality, mindfulness, spiritual experiences, distress

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73633
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73633
ISSN: 0084-6724
PURE UUID: d9005360-7db4-4e85-b4eb-4a4228737000

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 22:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Niko Kohls
Author: Harald Walach
Author: George Lewith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×