The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services

Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services
Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services
Establishment of protected area networks to protect species and habitats has been one of the most effective conservation tools used around the world. On this premise Madagascar is planning to triple its protected areas by 2012. Recent studies have addressed the design of this new network in order to optimize biodiversity conservation. However, given the limited time, available resources and looming imminent threats both to biodiversity and to ecosystem services, we argue that we need to prioritize this process by including human related factors. We developed a framework and three composite indices, incorporating human related threats, ecosystem services and biological measures, which we used to identify priorities within the developing protected area network of Madagascar. In particular, we examined data on human population, roads, agricultural suitability and fire prevalence, alongside measures of hydrological and biological importance. Sixteen key biodiversity sites, which were not formally gazetted in the first round of designation, emerged as especially important for both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Two of these unprotected sites contain endemic frog species under imminent threat of extinction. Six of the sites we highlighted were subject to high-human pressure, while we detected limited human activity in the other ten. Our framework is computationally straight-forward and applicable to other regions of the world, and could be applied alongside community and stakeholder consultation
conservation planning, aquatic ecosystem services, geographic information systems, key biodiversity areas, madagascar, protected areas, socioeconomic factors
0169-2046
48-56
Rogers, Heather M.
e854bddd-3224-48da-bf21-2fef71a053be
Glew, Louise
d605d3ea-3748-4492-87b9-a6326a035672
Honzak, Miroslav
281315cb-7166-47a5-8522-45c16227f809
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Rogers, Heather M.
e854bddd-3224-48da-bf21-2fef71a053be
Glew, Louise
d605d3ea-3748-4492-87b9-a6326a035672
Honzak, Miroslav
281315cb-7166-47a5-8522-45c16227f809
Hudson, Malcolm D.
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55

Rogers, Heather M., Glew, Louise, Honzak, Miroslav and Hudson, Malcolm D. (2010) Prioritizing key biodiversity areas in Madagascar by including data on human pressure and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96 (1), 48-56. (doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.02.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Establishment of protected area networks to protect species and habitats has been one of the most effective conservation tools used around the world. On this premise Madagascar is planning to triple its protected areas by 2012. Recent studies have addressed the design of this new network in order to optimize biodiversity conservation. However, given the limited time, available resources and looming imminent threats both to biodiversity and to ecosystem services, we argue that we need to prioritize this process by including human related factors. We developed a framework and three composite indices, incorporating human related threats, ecosystem services and biological measures, which we used to identify priorities within the developing protected area network of Madagascar. In particular, we examined data on human population, roads, agricultural suitability and fire prevalence, alongside measures of hydrological and biological importance. Sixteen key biodiversity sites, which were not formally gazetted in the first round of designation, emerged as especially important for both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Two of these unprotected sites contain endemic frog species under imminent threat of extinction. Six of the sites we highlighted were subject to high-human pressure, while we detected limited human activity in the other ten. Our framework is computationally straight-forward and applicable to other regions of the world, and could be applied alongside community and stakeholder consultation

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 May 2010
Keywords: conservation planning, aquatic ecosystem services, geographic information systems, key biodiversity areas, madagascar, protected areas, socioeconomic factors
Organisations: Civil Engineering & the Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73818
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73818
ISSN: 0169-2046
PURE UUID: 05751a10-aa6b-4c85-9717-df558a63c54c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 22:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Heather M. Rogers
Author: Louise Glew
Author: Miroslav Honzak

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×