The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion

Anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion
Anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion
In this study the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sludge at pilot-scale, have been presented. The thermophilic reactor was operated at solids retention time between 75–20 days, while the mesophilic process was operated at 27 days. Evaluation of performance was in terms of a number of quantities including: OLR removal (as kg m–3 d–1 VS and kg m–3 d–1
COD), methane generation (as m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr), individual volatile fatty acids(VFAs) generation, and total acidity.
Experimentally it was confirmed that the maximum loading rate achieved was 1.87kg m–3 d–1 VS and 3.12 kg m–3 d–1 COD (at SRT: 20 days) for the themophilic process. Under these conditions, the volatile solids removal efficiency and organic removal efficiency was 38.0% VSr and 24.7 % CODr respectively, and the methane generation was 0.24 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr. At SRT 27 days and mesophilic conditions, the organic loading rate removal was 0.69 kg m–3 d–1 VSr and 1.37 kg m–3 d–1 CODr and the methane generation was 0.40 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr. At the same SRT, the thermophilic process operated with 0.80 kg m–3 d–1 VSr and 0.96 kg m–3 d–1 CODr organic loading rate removal, and the methane generation was 0.24 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr.
The experimental results showed, that with 27 days retention time there was little difference in the VS removal efficiency by two types of processes at organic loading rates (OLR) up to 1.3 kg m–3 d–1 VS. However, at low SRT, the thermophilic reactor produced more gas than the mesophilic at OLR up to 2.19 kg m–3 d–1 COD
0352-9568
119-124
de la Rubia Romero, M.A.
c93edd9f-0c39-49a3-883f-1582cf1c700c
Perez, M
ffc11c44-d0d6-4381-b75b-f84fa2e79d8c
Romero, L.I.
301ae5bd-ca72-48ba-88f0-e5fcb1972fe2
Sales, D.
ea740c44-981c-4211-b163-2cfa6c7f38c0
de la Rubia Romero, M.A.
c93edd9f-0c39-49a3-883f-1582cf1c700c
Perez, M
ffc11c44-d0d6-4381-b75b-f84fa2e79d8c
Romero, L.I.
301ae5bd-ca72-48ba-88f0-e5fcb1972fe2
Sales, D.
ea740c44-981c-4211-b163-2cfa6c7f38c0

de la Rubia Romero, M.A., Perez, M, Romero, L.I. and Sales, D. (2002) Anaerobic mesophilic and thermophilic municipal sludge digestion. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, 16 (3), 119-124.

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this study the performance of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sludge at pilot-scale, have been presented. The thermophilic reactor was operated at solids retention time between 75–20 days, while the mesophilic process was operated at 27 days. Evaluation of performance was in terms of a number of quantities including: OLR removal (as kg m–3 d–1 VS and kg m–3 d–1
COD), methane generation (as m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr), individual volatile fatty acids(VFAs) generation, and total acidity.
Experimentally it was confirmed that the maximum loading rate achieved was 1.87kg m–3 d–1 VS and 3.12 kg m–3 d–1 COD (at SRT: 20 days) for the themophilic process. Under these conditions, the volatile solids removal efficiency and organic removal efficiency was 38.0% VSr and 24.7 % CODr respectively, and the methane generation was 0.24 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr. At SRT 27 days and mesophilic conditions, the organic loading rate removal was 0.69 kg m–3 d–1 VSr and 1.37 kg m–3 d–1 CODr and the methane generation was 0.40 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr. At the same SRT, the thermophilic process operated with 0.80 kg m–3 d–1 VSr and 0.96 kg m–3 d–1 CODr organic loading rate removal, and the methane generation was 0.24 m3 kg–1 CH4 in the VSr.
The experimental results showed, that with 27 days retention time there was little difference in the VS removal efficiency by two types of processes at organic loading rates (OLR) up to 1.3 kg m–3 d–1 VS. However, at low SRT, the thermophilic reactor produced more gas than the mesophilic at OLR up to 2.19 kg m–3 d–1 COD

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73860
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73860
ISSN: 0352-9568
PURE UUID: 1bb46978-0d25-4f99-8493-b6e81cb0c700

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 17:23

Export record

Contributors

Author: M.A. de la Rubia Romero
Author: M Perez
Author: L.I. Romero
Author: D. Sales

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×