The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How can we support the commander’s involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning

How can we support the commander’s involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning
How can we support the commander’s involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning
At Battlegroup level within military organisations, mission-planning teams comprise specialist roles in intelligence, military strategy, geography, metrology, ordinance, etc. This team is led by the Battlegroup commander who expresses his desired intent to the team, leaving them to develop courses of action while he or she undertakes other tasks. The routine departure of the commander gives rise to the purpose of this study. A total of 108 participants enabled 36 planning teams of three individuals to be composed. The experimental teamwork task was based on the game chess and used a variety of different technological means to facilitate distributed planning, which were then compared with a collocated planning (face-to-face) condition in an A-B-A design. The results show that broadly comparable levels of performance in some areas are reliant on considerably different processes of team adaptation in others. Performance time and overall workload remained relatively stable, yet the number of chess moves made, time pressure and surprise recall performance were considerably elevated in the distributed planning condition. Overall, it appears that the commander can be kept involved in the planning process even though they are remote from it but with some caveats attached. Relevance to industry: Distributed teamworking is a major component of emerging command and control paradigms variously called Network Enabled Capability (NEC). An important challenge for realising the benefits of NEC is to design technology to support distributed teamworking in such a way that it is not merely technically effective but jointly optimised.
0169-8141
456-464
Walker, Guy H.
6439272c-58bb-4463-84d3-61357d91b2b6
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Salmon, Paul M.
8fcdacc0-31f9-4276-bd9e-8127db6c806e
Jenkins, Dan P.
9a589737-1f72-4c73-9296-0affd01efb4a
Walker, Guy H.
6439272c-58bb-4463-84d3-61357d91b2b6
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Salmon, Paul M.
8fcdacc0-31f9-4276-bd9e-8127db6c806e
Jenkins, Dan P.
9a589737-1f72-4c73-9296-0affd01efb4a

Walker, Guy H., Stanton, Neville A., Salmon, Paul M. and Jenkins, Dan P. (2009) How can we support the commander’s involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (2), 456-464. (doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

At Battlegroup level within military organisations, mission-planning teams comprise specialist roles in intelligence, military strategy, geography, metrology, ordinance, etc. This team is led by the Battlegroup commander who expresses his desired intent to the team, leaving them to develop courses of action while he or she undertakes other tasks. The routine departure of the commander gives rise to the purpose of this study. A total of 108 participants enabled 36 planning teams of three individuals to be composed. The experimental teamwork task was based on the game chess and used a variety of different technological means to facilitate distributed planning, which were then compared with a collocated planning (face-to-face) condition in an A-B-A design. The results show that broadly comparable levels of performance in some areas are reliant on considerably different processes of team adaptation in others. Performance time and overall workload remained relatively stable, yet the number of chess moves made, time pressure and surprise recall performance were considerably elevated in the distributed planning condition. Overall, it appears that the commander can be kept involved in the planning process even though they are remote from it but with some caveats attached. Relevance to industry: Distributed teamworking is a major component of emerging command and control paradigms variously called Network Enabled Capability (NEC). An important challenge for realising the benefits of NEC is to design technology to support distributed teamworking in such a way that it is not merely technically effective but jointly optimised.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 73979
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73979
ISSN: 0169-8141
PURE UUID: ef180149-bc9f-4b0b-aa57-c42c510e05f5
ORCID for Neville A. Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-3279

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Guy H. Walker
Author: Paul M. Salmon
Author: Dan P. Jenkins

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×