The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Competition in transit markets

Competition in transit markets
Competition in transit markets
Despite regulatory reforms in a number of countries, competition in transit markets is still relatively rare. Moreover, where it does occur it tends to be small group in nature and the outcomes are difficult to predict. In this paper, simulation models of competition in inter-urban rail markets and urban bus markets are developed and applied in studies of Great Britain and Sweden. It is found that on busy routes head-on competition is commercially feasible (although for rail this assumes low access charges) but is not socially desirable. For routes with thin demand (or high access costs), competition may be limited to cream skimming. In most competed cases, there appears to be a tendency for the provision of too much service, at too high price and (at least for bus) at too low quality. Rather than classical Bertrand–Cournot oligopoly models, transit markets may be best described by models of oligopolistic competition based on horizontal product differentiation
bus, rail, oligopoly, oligopolistic competition
0739-8859
75-84
Preston, John
ef81c42e-c896-4768-92d1-052662037f0b
Preston, John
ef81c42e-c896-4768-92d1-052662037f0b

Preston, John (2008) Competition in transit markets. [in special issue: Transit Economics] Research in Transportation Economics, 23 (1), 75-84. (doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2008.10.009).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Despite regulatory reforms in a number of countries, competition in transit markets is still relatively rare. Moreover, where it does occur it tends to be small group in nature and the outcomes are difficult to predict. In this paper, simulation models of competition in inter-urban rail markets and urban bus markets are developed and applied in studies of Great Britain and Sweden. It is found that on busy routes head-on competition is commercially feasible (although for rail this assumes low access charges) but is not socially desirable. For routes with thin demand (or high access costs), competition may be limited to cream skimming. In most competed cases, there appears to be a tendency for the provision of too much service, at too high price and (at least for bus) at too low quality. Rather than classical Bertrand–Cournot oligopoly models, transit markets may be best described by models of oligopolistic competition based on horizontal product differentiation

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2008
Keywords: bus, rail, oligopoly, oligopolistic competition

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 74299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/74299
ISSN: 0739-8859
PURE UUID: 469ae4ae-8dd9-439a-bc1c-8abc3fe97a0d
ORCID for John Preston: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-049X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×