The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The geotechnical value of ground stiffness determined using seismic methods

The geotechnical value of ground stiffness determined using seismic methods
The geotechnical value of ground stiffness determined using seismic methods
Geotechnical design routinely requires that the in situ strength, stiffness and permeability of the ground be determined. Most satisfactory designs for constructions such as buildings, excavations and tunnels ensure that an adequate margin of safety is maintained, and, under these conditions, measurements of the stiffness of the ground are required so that movements in the ground, both during and after construction, can be calculated.

Over the past two decades the careful back-analysis of the behaviour of the ground around constructions such as tunnels and excavations has repeatedly shown that the in situ stiffness of soils and rocks is much higher than was previously thought, and that stress—strain behaviour of these materials is non-linear in most cases. Numerical analyses, using finite element and finite difference computations and field observations, have demonstrated that when margins of safety are adequate the strain levels in the ground around retaining walls, foundations and tunnels are small, and typically of the order of 0.0-l%–0.1%. Improved measurements in the laboratory have confirmed the non-linear stress-strain behaviour of soil, and shown that stiffness is much higher when measured locally and at small strain levels than when determined using conventional laboratory techniques.

The realization that strain levels around construction are small, and that field stiffnesses are much higher than previously measured in the laboratory, has led us to re-appraise the value of stiffnesses derived from field seismic geophysical methods. Such methods allow stiffnesses to be determined on representative volumes of the ground, and at the in situ stress state, and for this reason may provide valuable data. This paper reviews the importance of stiffness in geotechnical design and how seismic methods are used in ground stiffness investigations.

0267-9914
113-123
Matthews, M.C.
d02f32ac-4928-4942-810e-f60e7d7123a5
Hope, V.S.
9dd533f5-648a-442f-ad85-77fc7d73d217
Clayton, C.R.I.
8397d691-b35b-4d3f-a6d8-40678f233869
Matthews, M.C.
d02f32ac-4928-4942-810e-f60e7d7123a5
Hope, V.S.
9dd533f5-648a-442f-ad85-77fc7d73d217
Clayton, C.R.I.
8397d691-b35b-4d3f-a6d8-40678f233869

Matthews, M.C., Hope, V.S. and Clayton, C.R.I. (1997) The geotechnical value of ground stiffness determined using seismic methods. Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology, 12, 113-123. (doi:10.1144/?GSL.ENG.1997.012.01.10).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Geotechnical design routinely requires that the in situ strength, stiffness and permeability of the ground be determined. Most satisfactory designs for constructions such as buildings, excavations and tunnels ensure that an adequate margin of safety is maintained, and, under these conditions, measurements of the stiffness of the ground are required so that movements in the ground, both during and after construction, can be calculated.

Over the past two decades the careful back-analysis of the behaviour of the ground around constructions such as tunnels and excavations has repeatedly shown that the in situ stiffness of soils and rocks is much higher than was previously thought, and that stress—strain behaviour of these materials is non-linear in most cases. Numerical analyses, using finite element and finite difference computations and field observations, have demonstrated that when margins of safety are adequate the strain levels in the ground around retaining walls, foundations and tunnels are small, and typically of the order of 0.0-l%–0.1%. Improved measurements in the laboratory have confirmed the non-linear stress-strain behaviour of soil, and shown that stiffness is much higher when measured locally and at small strain levels than when determined using conventional laboratory techniques.

The realization that strain levels around construction are small, and that field stiffnesses are much higher than previously measured in the laboratory, has led us to re-appraise the value of stiffnesses derived from field seismic geophysical methods. Such methods allow stiffnesses to be determined on representative volumes of the ground, and at the in situ stress state, and for this reason may provide valuable data. This paper reviews the importance of stiffness in geotechnical design and how seismic methods are used in ground stiffness investigations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1997

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 74848
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/74848
ISSN: 0267-9914
PURE UUID: e0b7791a-262d-4e4a-af1f-53c13cff01be
ORCID for C.R.I. Clayton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-8437

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M.C. Matthews
Author: V.S. Hope
Author: C.R.I. Clayton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×