The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of carbonyl compound concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites

A comparison of carbonyl compound concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites
A comparison of carbonyl compound concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites
Measurements of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal, crotonaldehyde, acrolein, propanal, benzaldehyde and iso-valeraldehyde concentrations were made at two locations (four sites) in London, UK. One location was in Ealing, West London, while the other was in Wood Green, North London. At each location, a residential and commercial roadside site was identified and monitored. The measurements were made using a derivatisation technique in which sample air was pumped through an acidified solution of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, producing hydrazones which were separated and quantified using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Quantitative determinations were made for 26 and 47 samples at the Ealing and Wood Green locations respectively during 1991 and 1992. The average concentrations determined at the Ealing location for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal and crotonaldehyde (taking into account concentrations below the detection limits) were 15.0, 2.5, 1.5 and 1.2 ppb, respectively (residential site), and for the commercial site the corresponding values were 19.2, 1.6, 1.2 and 0.5 ppb. Similarly, at the residential site in Wood Green, the average concentrations for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal and crotonaldehyde were 3.4, 1.9, 0.5 and 0.5 ppb, respectively, while at the commercial site the average concentrations for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and hexanal were 7.4, 2.3 and 0.6 ppb. Acrolein, propanal, benzaldehyde and iso-valeraldehyde were not detected at either survey location. At the residential location in Wood Green, sufficient samples were collected to allow the data to be statistically divided into morning and afternoon collection periods, and the data show that the aldehyde concentrations were generally slightly higher in the afternoon. The observed concentrations reported here are compared with previously reported measurements in the UK and with indoor measurements taken at the Bounds Green Campus of Middlesex University. The advantages and limitations of the method employed are also discussed and compared with a solid-phase extraction technique.
carbonyl compounds, air pollution, indoor sites, urban sites
0048-9697
475-483
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Revitt, D.M.
6aa64eac-6d96-4aca-929e-7aa9d00f6cee
Hamilton, R.
72e263b1-85bd-4d9e-b97e-498d76e6e771
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Revitt, D.M.
6aa64eac-6d96-4aca-929e-7aa9d00f6cee
Hamilton, R.
72e263b1-85bd-4d9e-b97e-498d76e6e771

Williams, I.D., Revitt, D.M. and Hamilton, R. (1996) A comparison of carbonyl compound concentrations at urban roadside and indoor sites. Science of the Total Environment, 1899-190 (190), 475-483. (doi:10.1016/0048-9697(96)05248-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Measurements of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal, crotonaldehyde, acrolein, propanal, benzaldehyde and iso-valeraldehyde concentrations were made at two locations (four sites) in London, UK. One location was in Ealing, West London, while the other was in Wood Green, North London. At each location, a residential and commercial roadside site was identified and monitored. The measurements were made using a derivatisation technique in which sample air was pumped through an acidified solution of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, producing hydrazones which were separated and quantified using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Quantitative determinations were made for 26 and 47 samples at the Ealing and Wood Green locations respectively during 1991 and 1992. The average concentrations determined at the Ealing location for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal and crotonaldehyde (taking into account concentrations below the detection limits) were 15.0, 2.5, 1.5 and 1.2 ppb, respectively (residential site), and for the commercial site the corresponding values were 19.2, 1.6, 1.2 and 0.5 ppb. Similarly, at the residential site in Wood Green, the average concentrations for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, hexanal and crotonaldehyde were 3.4, 1.9, 0.5 and 0.5 ppb, respectively, while at the commercial site the average concentrations for formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and hexanal were 7.4, 2.3 and 0.6 ppb. Acrolein, propanal, benzaldehyde and iso-valeraldehyde were not detected at either survey location. At the residential location in Wood Green, sufficient samples were collected to allow the data to be statistically divided into morning and afternoon collection periods, and the data show that the aldehyde concentrations were generally slightly higher in the afternoon. The observed concentrations reported here are compared with previously reported measurements in the UK and with indoor measurements taken at the Bounds Green Campus of Middlesex University. The advantages and limitations of the method employed are also discussed and compared with a solid-phase extraction technique.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 28 October 1996
Keywords: carbonyl compounds, air pollution, indoor sites, urban sites

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 75764
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/75764
ISSN: 0048-9697
PURE UUID: 2f6ab1aa-16f9-4190-987c-a1958bd50ed6
ORCID for I.D. Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: I.D. Williams ORCID iD
Author: D.M. Revitt
Author: R. Hamilton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×