Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy
Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy
Difficulties in speech recognition experienced by cochlear implant users may be attributed both to information loss caused by signal processing and to information loss associated with the interface between the electrode array and auditory nervous system, including cross-channel interaction. The objective of the work reported here was to attempt to partial out the relative contribution of these different factors to consonant recognition. This was achieved by comparing patterns of consonant feature recognition as a function of channel number and presence/absence of background noise in users of the Nucleus 24 device with normal hearing subjects listening to acoustic models that mimicked processing of that device. Additionally, in the acoustic model experiment, a simulation of cross-channel spread of excitation, or “channel interaction,” was varied. Results showed that acoustic model experiments were highly correlated with patterns of performance in better-performing cochlear implant users. Deficits to consonant recognition in this subgroup could be attributed to cochlear implant processing, whereas channel interaction played a much smaller role in determining performance errors. The study also showed that large changes to channel number in the Advanced Combination Encoder signal processing strategy led to no substantial changes in performance.
cochlear implants, electrodes, hearing, neurophysiology, speech processing, speech recognition
1723-36
Verschuur, Carl
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
March 2009
Verschuur, Carl
5e15ee1c-3a44-4dbe-ad43-ec3b50111e41
Verschuur, Carl
(2009)
Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125 (3), .
(doi:10.1121/1.3075554).
Abstract
Difficulties in speech recognition experienced by cochlear implant users may be attributed both to information loss caused by signal processing and to information loss associated with the interface between the electrode array and auditory nervous system, including cross-channel interaction. The objective of the work reported here was to attempt to partial out the relative contribution of these different factors to consonant recognition. This was achieved by comparing patterns of consonant feature recognition as a function of channel number and presence/absence of background noise in users of the Nucleus 24 device with normal hearing subjects listening to acoustic models that mimicked processing of that device. Additionally, in the acoustic model experiment, a simulation of cross-channel spread of excitation, or “channel interaction,” was varied. Results showed that acoustic model experiments were highly correlated with patterns of performance in better-performing cochlear implant users. Deficits to consonant recognition in this subgroup could be attributed to cochlear implant processing, whereas channel interaction played a much smaller role in determining performance errors. The study also showed that large changes to channel number in the Advanced Combination Encoder signal processing strategy led to no substantial changes in performance.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2009
Keywords:
cochlear implants, electrodes, hearing, neurophysiology, speech processing, speech recognition
Organisations:
Human Sciences Group, Institute of Sound & Vibration Research
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 79038
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79038
ISSN: 0001-4966
PURE UUID: 2bc212d4-b359-42ca-9d06-f08f2a34f845
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:27
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics