The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Motion sickness with fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation: Effect of oscillation frequency

Motion sickness with fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation: Effect of oscillation frequency
Motion sickness with fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation: Effect of oscillation frequency
Background:
During lateral acceleration, the addition of an appropriate roll motion can improve comfort, but some combinations of lateral and roll motion increase motion sickness.
Objectives:
To determine how motion sickness caused by lateral oscillation fully compensated by roll oscillation (so subjects feel no lateral acceleration) depends on the frequency of oscillation and compare sickness with that caused by uncompensated lateral oscillation.
Method:
A total of 160 subjects (8 groups of 20) were exposed for 30 min to fully roll-compensated sinusoidal lateral oscillation at one of 8 frequencies (0.05, 0.08, 0.125, 0.16, 0.20, 0.315, 0.5, 0.8 Hz). A further 60 subjects (3 groups of 20) were exposed to lateral oscillation (at 0.315, 0.5, or 0.8 Hz) to allow comparison of sickness with that caused by uncompensated lateral oscillation at frequencies not previously studied. Subjects rated symptoms at 1-min intervals.
Results:
With fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation, illness ratings tended to increase with increasing frequency of oscillation from 0.05 to 0.2 Hz (with peak lateral velocity, ± 1.0 m · s?1) and tended to decrease from 0.315 to 0.8 Hz (with peak lateral jerk, ± 1.96 m · s?3). Roll compensation significantly reduced the duration before subjects developed nausea.
Conclusions:
Motion sickness is increased by roll oscillation used to compensate fully for low-frequency lateral oscillation. In general, when roll oscillation is combined with low-frequency lateral oscillation, motion sickness cannot be predicted from either the roll oscillation or the lateral oscillation alone. The dependence of motion sickness on the frequency of oscillation is broadly similar for pure lateral oscillation and 100% roll-compensated lateral oscillation.
motion sickness, nausea, vomiting, horizontal, lateral, roll, oscillation, translation, rotation, acceleration, frequency, compensation
0095-6562
94-101
Donohew, B. E.
7e63340d-8a31-4378-a546-8b20ee385101
Griffin, M. J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Donohew, B. E.
7e63340d-8a31-4378-a546-8b20ee385101
Griffin, M. J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8

Donohew, B. E. and Griffin, M. J. (2009) Motion sickness with fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation: Effect of oscillation frequency. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 80 (2), 94-101. (doi:10.3357/ASEM.2345.2009).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background:
During lateral acceleration, the addition of an appropriate roll motion can improve comfort, but some combinations of lateral and roll motion increase motion sickness.
Objectives:
To determine how motion sickness caused by lateral oscillation fully compensated by roll oscillation (so subjects feel no lateral acceleration) depends on the frequency of oscillation and compare sickness with that caused by uncompensated lateral oscillation.
Method:
A total of 160 subjects (8 groups of 20) were exposed for 30 min to fully roll-compensated sinusoidal lateral oscillation at one of 8 frequencies (0.05, 0.08, 0.125, 0.16, 0.20, 0.315, 0.5, 0.8 Hz). A further 60 subjects (3 groups of 20) were exposed to lateral oscillation (at 0.315, 0.5, or 0.8 Hz) to allow comparison of sickness with that caused by uncompensated lateral oscillation at frequencies not previously studied. Subjects rated symptoms at 1-min intervals.
Results:
With fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation, illness ratings tended to increase with increasing frequency of oscillation from 0.05 to 0.2 Hz (with peak lateral velocity, ± 1.0 m · s?1) and tended to decrease from 0.315 to 0.8 Hz (with peak lateral jerk, ± 1.96 m · s?3). Roll compensation significantly reduced the duration before subjects developed nausea.
Conclusions:
Motion sickness is increased by roll oscillation used to compensate fully for low-frequency lateral oscillation. In general, when roll oscillation is combined with low-frequency lateral oscillation, motion sickness cannot be predicted from either the roll oscillation or the lateral oscillation alone. The dependence of motion sickness on the frequency of oscillation is broadly similar for pure lateral oscillation and 100% roll-compensated lateral oscillation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2009
Keywords: motion sickness, nausea, vomiting, horizontal, lateral, roll, oscillation, translation, rotation, acceleration, frequency, compensation
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 79042
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79042
ISSN: 0095-6562
PURE UUID: d0eb9b81-81b6-4fc1-87b1-190656a5e818
ORCID for M. J. Griffin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9502

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: B. E. Donohew
Author: M. J. Griffin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×