The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review

Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review
Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review
Objective: the variability in the conceptualization and categorization of social support has resulted in mixed findings regarding its role in cancer progression. This systematic review identifies and summarizes the evidence for the significance of two important indices of social support in progression of different cancers.

Method: we used systematic and replicable methods to search, select, and evaluate findings.

Results: thirty-one longitudinal prospective findings (in 26 papers) which were selected for inclusion categorized social support into structural and functional support. The types of cancer included in these studies fell into three major categories: breast cancer (16), other cancer (10), and mixed cancers (5). Results suggest that the evidence for the relationship between social support and cancer progression is sufficiently strong for breast cancer as shown by five out of seven methodologically sound studies but consistently unconvincing for other types of cancer or in studies which combined different types of cancer. Structural support indices were found to be more frequently associated with disease progression than the indices of functional support in breast cancer. Disease-related variables such as severity, treatment, nodal status, and site of metastasis were found to be significant predictors of cancer progression, and it is suggested that these variables must be considered when conducting studies on the role of psychosocial factors in cancer-related outcomes including progression.

Conclusion: methodological limitations of the studies and counterintuitive findings are discussed, and further conclusive research, particularly randomized controlled trials of social support interventions, is warranted to support the findings of this systematic review
cancer, functional support, progression, social support, structural support
0022-3999
403-415
Nausheen, Bina
947da4a2-c233-45b1-b7b7-eca98a19137d
Gidron, Yori
56310d95-dcfd-4178-95f1-1b1049f4c1f7
Peveler, Robert
93198224-78d9-4c1f-9c07-fdecfa69cf96
Moss-Morris, Rona
a502f58a-d319-49a6-8aea-9dde4efc871e
Nausheen, Bina
947da4a2-c233-45b1-b7b7-eca98a19137d
Gidron, Yori
56310d95-dcfd-4178-95f1-1b1049f4c1f7
Peveler, Robert
93198224-78d9-4c1f-9c07-fdecfa69cf96
Moss-Morris, Rona
a502f58a-d319-49a6-8aea-9dde4efc871e

Nausheen, Bina, Gidron, Yori, Peveler, Robert and Moss-Morris, Rona (2009) Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 67 (5), 403-415. (doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.12.012). (PMID:19837203)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: the variability in the conceptualization and categorization of social support has resulted in mixed findings regarding its role in cancer progression. This systematic review identifies and summarizes the evidence for the significance of two important indices of social support in progression of different cancers.

Method: we used systematic and replicable methods to search, select, and evaluate findings.

Results: thirty-one longitudinal prospective findings (in 26 papers) which were selected for inclusion categorized social support into structural and functional support. The types of cancer included in these studies fell into three major categories: breast cancer (16), other cancer (10), and mixed cancers (5). Results suggest that the evidence for the relationship between social support and cancer progression is sufficiently strong for breast cancer as shown by five out of seven methodologically sound studies but consistently unconvincing for other types of cancer or in studies which combined different types of cancer. Structural support indices were found to be more frequently associated with disease progression than the indices of functional support in breast cancer. Disease-related variables such as severity, treatment, nodal status, and site of metastasis were found to be significant predictors of cancer progression, and it is suggested that these variables must be considered when conducting studies on the role of psychosocial factors in cancer-related outcomes including progression.

Conclusion: methodological limitations of the studies and counterintuitive findings are discussed, and further conclusive research, particularly randomized controlled trials of social support interventions, is warranted to support the findings of this systematic review

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2009
Keywords: cancer, functional support, progression, social support, structural support
Organisations: Faculty of Medicine, Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 79473
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79473
ISSN: 0022-3999
PURE UUID: 77e279a7-b7bd-4fc8-8a71-fa2c56a81676
ORCID for Robert Peveler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-9394

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bina Nausheen
Author: Yori Gidron
Author: Robert Peveler ORCID iD
Author: Rona Moss-Morris

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×