The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A setback for arbitration

A setback for arbitration
A setback for arbitration
The English courts can no longer grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain a party from commencing or pursuing court proceedings in an EC member state or Lugano Contracting State. That they could not do so to restrain a breach of an exclusive English court jurisdiction agreement has been clear for some time as a result of the decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Gasser v Misat, Case C-116/02 [2003] ECR I-14693 and Turner v Grovit, Case C-159/02 [2004] ECR I-3565. The English court had, however, continued to grant such injunctions where the proceedings were in breach of an arbitration clause, 1 on the basis that arbitration proceedings fall outside the scope of the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the ‘EC Jurisdiction Regulation’) as they are excluded by art 1(2)(d). 2 In Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA) v West Tankers Inc (The Front Comor), Case C-185/07 the ECJ has held that such an injunction is not consistent with the EC Jurisdiction Regulation.
1471-9614
1-3
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6

Baatz, Yvonne (2009) A setback for arbitration. Shipping and Trade Law, 9 (4), 1-3.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The English courts can no longer grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain a party from commencing or pursuing court proceedings in an EC member state or Lugano Contracting State. That they could not do so to restrain a breach of an exclusive English court jurisdiction agreement has been clear for some time as a result of the decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Gasser v Misat, Case C-116/02 [2003] ECR I-14693 and Turner v Grovit, Case C-159/02 [2004] ECR I-3565. The English court had, however, continued to grant such injunctions where the proceedings were in breach of an arbitration clause, 1 on the basis that arbitration proceedings fall outside the scope of the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the ‘EC Jurisdiction Regulation’) as they are excluded by art 1(2)(d). 2 In Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA) v West Tankers Inc (The Front Comor), Case C-185/07 the ECJ has held that such an injunction is not consistent with the EC Jurisdiction Regulation.

PDF
Baatz_Y_2009_Issue_4.pdf - Other
Download (86kB)

More information

Published date: April 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 79609
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79609
ISSN: 1471-9614
PURE UUID: 2e561be2-a4fd-4ad0-8b6b-7de2072cf1dd

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Mar 2010
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 23:17

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×