The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A survey of non-depolarising muscle relaxants used in cardiac anaesthesia and surgery

A survey of non-depolarising muscle relaxants used in cardiac anaesthesia and surgery
A survey of non-depolarising muscle relaxants used in cardiac anaesthesia and surgery
Introduction: Residual neuromuscular blockade contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality, and is more common with long-acting non-depolarising muscle relaxants (NDMRs) such as pancuronium [1]. This phenomenon may be a common occurrence in ‘fast-track’ managed cardiac patients administered long-acting NDMRs. We examine the usage of NDMRs in cardiac anaesthesia in the United Kingdom.
Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 310 consultant cardiac anaesthetists in the United Kingdom. We asked which NDMRs are preferred (differentiating between ‘fast-track’ [FT] and ‘non-fast-track’ [NFT] management of patients), and what methods are used to assess neuromuscular function prior to extubation.
Results: There was a 72.6% (225/310) response rate, of which 217 responses were valid. A single-agent NDMR technique is most prevalent for both NFT (92.2%) and FT patients (88.5%). Pancuronium (either as sole agent or in combination with another NDMR) was the first choice for NFT and FT patients, 73.7% and 52.1% respectively. For both management strategies, rocuronium is the next most popular agent. Benzylisoquinolinium derivatives are not in common usage. Forty-nine out of 211 anaesthetists (where a comparison could be made) changed their choice of NDMR between NFT and FT patients. The majority of these anaesthetists (85.7%) remove pancuronium from their practice for FT patients. Of respondents, 20.7% (45/217) indicated that an assessment of neuromuscular function was part of an extubation protocol; 75.6% (34/45) of these respondents detailed only clinical methods, whilst 6.7% (3/45) indicated use of a ‘neuromuscular function monitor’ alone, with 15.6% (7/45) indicating use of both methods. Amongst the responses indicating ‘neuromuscular function monitor’ methods, an assessment of the ‘train-of-four’ was the commonest response. Less than 10% monitor the neuromuscular junction during surgery.
Conclusions: Pancuronium remains the most popular NDMR for all types of cardiac anaesthesia. Some anaesthetists modify their choice of NDMR for FT management, changing from pancuronium to a shorter acting NDMR as the commonest adaptation. A minority of respondents indicated that a protocol exists to routinely assess the neuromuscular function prior to extubation.
0012-3692
p.S1
Briggs, S.
5ab27f16-85cc-4fab-bc1b-01578b9c7fc4
Thomas, R.
6814ea6d-818e-4088-882f-2b87f0147d2a
Goodyear, P.
3fa2018b-b434-4a46-b7ef-6353ba76be38
Smith, D.
064e7b4d-dfe9-4ab5-9e06-d257251f6f86
Briggs, S.
5ab27f16-85cc-4fab-bc1b-01578b9c7fc4
Thomas, R.
6814ea6d-818e-4088-882f-2b87f0147d2a
Goodyear, P.
3fa2018b-b434-4a46-b7ef-6353ba76be38
Smith, D.
064e7b4d-dfe9-4ab5-9e06-d257251f6f86

Briggs, S., Thomas, R., Goodyear, P. and Smith, D. (2002) A survey of non-depolarising muscle relaxants used in cardiac anaesthesia and surgery. Chest, 6 (Suppl 2: 1), p.S1. (doi:10.1186/cc1805).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Residual neuromuscular blockade contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality, and is more common with long-acting non-depolarising muscle relaxants (NDMRs) such as pancuronium [1]. This phenomenon may be a common occurrence in ‘fast-track’ managed cardiac patients administered long-acting NDMRs. We examine the usage of NDMRs in cardiac anaesthesia in the United Kingdom.
Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 310 consultant cardiac anaesthetists in the United Kingdom. We asked which NDMRs are preferred (differentiating between ‘fast-track’ [FT] and ‘non-fast-track’ [NFT] management of patients), and what methods are used to assess neuromuscular function prior to extubation.
Results: There was a 72.6% (225/310) response rate, of which 217 responses were valid. A single-agent NDMR technique is most prevalent for both NFT (92.2%) and FT patients (88.5%). Pancuronium (either as sole agent or in combination with another NDMR) was the first choice for NFT and FT patients, 73.7% and 52.1% respectively. For both management strategies, rocuronium is the next most popular agent. Benzylisoquinolinium derivatives are not in common usage. Forty-nine out of 211 anaesthetists (where a comparison could be made) changed their choice of NDMR between NFT and FT patients. The majority of these anaesthetists (85.7%) remove pancuronium from their practice for FT patients. Of respondents, 20.7% (45/217) indicated that an assessment of neuromuscular function was part of an extubation protocol; 75.6% (34/45) of these respondents detailed only clinical methods, whilst 6.7% (3/45) indicated use of a ‘neuromuscular function monitor’ alone, with 15.6% (7/45) indicating use of both methods. Amongst the responses indicating ‘neuromuscular function monitor’ methods, an assessment of the ‘train-of-four’ was the commonest response. Less than 10% monitor the neuromuscular junction during surgery.
Conclusions: Pancuronium remains the most popular NDMR for all types of cardiac anaesthesia. Some anaesthetists modify their choice of NDMR for FT management, changing from pancuronium to a shorter acting NDMR as the commonest adaptation. A minority of respondents indicated that a protocol exists to routinely assess the neuromuscular function prior to extubation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 9 July 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 8197
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/8197
ISSN: 0012-3692
PURE UUID: 6700538f-aaa8-418d-84e9-330344c54357

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2004
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Briggs
Author: R. Thomas
Author: P. Goodyear
Author: D. Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×