Understanding and Using Technological Affordances: A Response to Boyle and Cook
Understanding and Using Technological Affordances: A Response to Boyle and Cook
Our use of affordance draws on Salomon (Salomon, 1993) who takes the definition back to Gibson and Norman (Gibson, 1977; Norman, 1988). Perhaps a key difference between the use of the term affordance in design is the emphasis on intended use, whereas our approach reflects Salomon’s focus on ‘possible’ use. Like Gibson the approach taken in our paper is focused on the relationship between the infrastructure of information and communication technologies and people’s use of those technologies. We are interested in asking questions about what uses ICT invites and facilitates, what it lends itself to and what it can do well. A potential difficulty with using a term so popular in the field of design is that ‘use’ tends to be focused on how something ‘should’ be used, what it is designed for. Discussion about affordance can be limited to the intended, prescribed or designed function of technology. We are also interested in exploring the creative and innovative way people respond to technologies and perhaps adapt them for use in unforeseen circumstances. An affordance of the technology does not simply refer to the intended use but also to the unintended consequences.
e-learning, ICT, affordances
301-317
Conole, Grainne
026d5812-74cf-430e-8c87-1bd3c44b2bc3
Dyke, Martin
aea86b1b-3942-4cba-819a-e0ddf7315c63
October 2004
Conole, Grainne
026d5812-74cf-430e-8c87-1bd3c44b2bc3
Dyke, Martin
aea86b1b-3942-4cba-819a-e0ddf7315c63
Conole, Grainne and Dyke, Martin
(2004)
Understanding and Using Technological Affordances: A Response to Boyle and Cook.
ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12 (3), .
(doi:10.1080/0968776042000259609).
Abstract
Our use of affordance draws on Salomon (Salomon, 1993) who takes the definition back to Gibson and Norman (Gibson, 1977; Norman, 1988). Perhaps a key difference between the use of the term affordance in design is the emphasis on intended use, whereas our approach reflects Salomon’s focus on ‘possible’ use. Like Gibson the approach taken in our paper is focused on the relationship between the infrastructure of information and communication technologies and people’s use of those technologies. We are interested in asking questions about what uses ICT invites and facilitates, what it lends itself to and what it can do well. A potential difficulty with using a term so popular in the field of design is that ‘use’ tends to be focused on how something ‘should’ be used, what it is designed for. Discussion about affordance can be limited to the intended, prescribed or designed function of technology. We are also interested in exploring the creative and innovative way people respond to technologies and perhaps adapt them for use in unforeseen circumstances. An affordance of the technology does not simply refer to the intended use but also to the unintended consequences.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: May 2004
Published date: October 2004
Keywords:
e-learning, ICT, affordances
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 9738
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/9738
PURE UUID: e20e07ef-7626-48d0-9033-217dceee6632
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Oct 2004
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Grainne Conole
Author:
Martin Dyke
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics