Phytoplankton community structure at contrasting sites in the Irish Sea: a modelling investigation
Phytoplankton community structure at contrasting sites in the Irish Sea: a modelling investigation
Factors controlling phytoplankton community structure were investigated at two sites in the western Irish Sea using an ecosystem model coupled to a one-dimensional physics model. The ecosystem model includes two compartments for phytoplankton (diatoms and non-diatoms) and zooplankton (meso- and microzooplankton), two nutrients (nitrogen and silicate) and a parameterisation of sediment dynamics. Diatoms were assigned higher maximum growth rates than non-diatoms in the model such that they are superior competitors, providing silicate is non-limiting. Resource limitation was formulated using a multiplicative model and temperature effects on biological processes were not included on account of a lack of a clear approach to do so. The model successfully reproduced seasonal cycles of primary production, chlorophyll and nutrients at both sites. The predicted dominance of diatoms during the summer at the coastal site was due to the supply of silicate from the sediment and top-down control of nondiatoms by microzooplankton grazing. Seasonal stratification at the offshore site prevented silicate of sedimentary origin from reaching surface waters, causing the mixed spring diatom-flagellate bloom to be replaced by non-diatoms with occasional diatom resurgence. Higher diatom abundance resulted in reduced grazing on microzooplankton by mesozooplankton and explains the
higher biomass of microzooplankton at the coastal station. It is concluded that under conditions of nutrient re-supply, top-down grazing helps to control the balance between diatoms and non-diatoms. In deeper, stratified waters, there is only bottom-up control (nutrient limitation) of phytoplankton community structure.
phytoplankton community structure, top-down factors, bottom-up factors, ecosystem model, Irish Sea
363-383
Kelly-Gerreyn, B.A.
1434d5fd-49f7-4774-b5ff-ddf334a3dcc2
Anderson, T.R.
dfed062f-e747-48d3-b59e-2f5e57a8571d
Holt, J.T.
82276683-d469-4d71-9f8a-a6105e31cd17
Gowen, R.J.
31e97c57-2642-42c4-a2c2-e3ce56a64771
Proctor, R.
991c42c3-7207-4509-a1b4-4e177ff3ac06
2004
Kelly-Gerreyn, B.A.
1434d5fd-49f7-4774-b5ff-ddf334a3dcc2
Anderson, T.R.
dfed062f-e747-48d3-b59e-2f5e57a8571d
Holt, J.T.
82276683-d469-4d71-9f8a-a6105e31cd17
Gowen, R.J.
31e97c57-2642-42c4-a2c2-e3ce56a64771
Proctor, R.
991c42c3-7207-4509-a1b4-4e177ff3ac06
Kelly-Gerreyn, B.A., Anderson, T.R., Holt, J.T., Gowen, R.J. and Proctor, R.
(2004)
Phytoplankton community structure at contrasting sites in the Irish Sea: a modelling investigation.
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 59 (3), .
Abstract
Factors controlling phytoplankton community structure were investigated at two sites in the western Irish Sea using an ecosystem model coupled to a one-dimensional physics model. The ecosystem model includes two compartments for phytoplankton (diatoms and non-diatoms) and zooplankton (meso- and microzooplankton), two nutrients (nitrogen and silicate) and a parameterisation of sediment dynamics. Diatoms were assigned higher maximum growth rates than non-diatoms in the model such that they are superior competitors, providing silicate is non-limiting. Resource limitation was formulated using a multiplicative model and temperature effects on biological processes were not included on account of a lack of a clear approach to do so. The model successfully reproduced seasonal cycles of primary production, chlorophyll and nutrients at both sites. The predicted dominance of diatoms during the summer at the coastal site was due to the supply of silicate from the sediment and top-down control of nondiatoms by microzooplankton grazing. Seasonal stratification at the offshore site prevented silicate of sedimentary origin from reaching surface waters, causing the mixed spring diatom-flagellate bloom to be replaced by non-diatoms with occasional diatom resurgence. Higher diatom abundance resulted in reduced grazing on microzooplankton by mesozooplankton and explains the
higher biomass of microzooplankton at the coastal station. It is concluded that under conditions of nutrient re-supply, top-down grazing helps to control the balance between diatoms and non-diatoms. In deeper, stratified waters, there is only bottom-up control (nutrient limitation) of phytoplankton community structure.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Keywords:
phytoplankton community structure, top-down factors, bottom-up factors, ecosystem model, Irish Sea
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 9829
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/9829
PURE UUID: 031ce68d-545a-4bfa-ae4b-c12e75a4b15e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Oct 2004
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 06:43
Export record
Contributors
Author:
B.A. Kelly-Gerreyn
Author:
T.R. Anderson
Author:
J.T. Holt
Author:
R.J. Gowen
Author:
R. Proctor
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics