ePrints SotonThe impact loss to authors and researchMichaelKurtzauthorTimBrodyauthorThe history of scientific communication is one of increasing access. The Gutenberg press allowed rapid and relatively inexpensive reproduction of the printed word. The advent of postal services allowed for the distribution of papers across countries and around the world by airmail. <br/>Peer-reviewed journals created consistent collections of quality-controlled papers, distributed to a wider audience of subscribers. And, as the volume of journals increased, research libraries created collections of journals, catalogued, and made them accessible to patrons from the shelves. The web – and open access, OA – will allow anyone with an internet connection to access all the peer-reviewed literature anywhere, anytime. Increased accessibility of the peer-reviewed literature should allow that literature to have a greater impact on future research, which will improve the quality of that research. <br/>Those who invest in and benefit from primary research, including the general public, have an interest in improvements to the quality of that research. The authors of the peer-reviewed literature also have an interest in increasing its impact, since that impact, as traditionally measured using citation counts, is a major element in the way their work is evaluated.<br/>Without debating the merits of evaluation by citation counting, this does provide a measurable (potential) benefit for authors that provide OA to their research papers. If OA increases citation impact – due to a greater number of scientists being able to access the paper – that presents a strong self-interest argument to encourage authors to go OA. It also hints at the extent to which restrictive access policies negatively affect research and its potential impact on future work.2006-07-17Chandos PublishingBook Section

For work being deposited by its own author or their nominees in the public archive: In self-archiving this item/collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant e-Prints Soton the right to store them, to make them available online without charge in accordance with the access setting selected and after the expiry of any embargo period stipulated to make them available publicly. I declare that any errors or omissions in the content of these items are the responsibility of the author and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that there is no infringement of anyone's copyright or moral rights. Where necessary, co-authors have agreed that these items can be deposited in relevant repositories. I also confirm that all necessary permissions to publish have been obtained from any third party sponsor or collaborator, particularly in relation to that third party's confidential information and that I have selected the appropriate access setting or embargo period thereby ensuring compliance with any contractual or confidentiality obligation applicable to my work. I understand that if there is notification of any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata that the e-Prints Steering Group will consult with the author in the first instance in line with the e-Prints Soton Takedown Policy and take immediate action as appropriate. All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright, where applicable, on the title page of their work.

For work being deposited by someone other than its author or their nominees in the public archive: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at e-Prints Soton is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept the same responsibilities as the author for any breach of copyright, contract or confidentiality that distributing these files or metadata may entail. Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.