New insulating material technologies for high transfer and sustainability
New insulating material technologies for high transfer and sustainability
Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) remains the primary insulating material employed in cable applications; however, it presents several limitations, including its inability to be recycled, the substantial energy demand associated with the crosslinking process, and the complexity of its manufacturing procedures. Therefore, isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is chosen as a thermoplastic alternative to replace XLPE in power cable insulation applications. As one of the most widespread engineering polymers, iPP has been considered in applications such as packaging, textiles and automobile industries long before it was considered in the cable industry. Its main disadvantage has historically been its high brittleness which has begun being addressed over the past 40 years with the addition of elastomers [1].
More specifically, since electrical and thermal performance is also crucial in the cable industry, some of the main challenges in the use of iPP, (also identified in the WP3.2 report) are:
· High mechanical modulus and brittleness (at room temperature)
· Formation of large spherulites
· Low thermal conductivity
Addressing these challenges necessitates material modifications such as blending with assorted elastomers, as well as other additives. These strategies will be reviewed in the following sections.
Life Cycle Center for Power CABLE diaGNOSIS
Vryonis, Orestis
4affde05-88f2-436f-b036-dceedf31ea9c
Saeedi, Istebreq
6df4dfcf-9bb8-4edc-952e-ccc4841f7b54
Vryonis, Orestis
4affde05-88f2-436f-b036-dceedf31ea9c
Saeedi, Istebreq
6df4dfcf-9bb8-4edc-952e-ccc4841f7b54
Vryonis, Orestis and Saeedi, Istebreq
(2026)
New insulating material technologies for high transfer and sustainability
Life Cycle Center for Power CABLE diaGNOSIS
(In Press)
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) remains the primary insulating material employed in cable applications; however, it presents several limitations, including its inability to be recycled, the substantial energy demand associated with the crosslinking process, and the complexity of its manufacturing procedures. Therefore, isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is chosen as a thermoplastic alternative to replace XLPE in power cable insulation applications. As one of the most widespread engineering polymers, iPP has been considered in applications such as packaging, textiles and automobile industries long before it was considered in the cable industry. Its main disadvantage has historically been its high brittleness which has begun being addressed over the past 40 years with the addition of elastomers [1].
More specifically, since electrical and thermal performance is also crucial in the cable industry, some of the main challenges in the use of iPP, (also identified in the WP3.2 report) are:
· High mechanical modulus and brittleness (at room temperature)
· Formation of large spherulites
· Low thermal conductivity
Addressing these challenges necessitates material modifications such as blending with assorted elastomers, as well as other additives. These strategies will be reviewed in the following sections.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: January 2026
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 513481
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/513481
PURE UUID: 9c045805-e098-425a-ae39-6d4b401573c5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Aug 2026 16:35
Last modified: 13 Sep 2026 15:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Orestis Vryonis
Author:
Istebreq Saeedi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics