The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: observational study using routinely collected data

Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: observational study using routinely collected data
Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: observational study using routinely collected data
Background: an association between quality of care and staffing levels, particularly registered nurses, has been established in acute hospitals. Recently an association between practice nurse staffing and quality of care for several chronic conditions has also been demonstrated in general practice. A smaller body of literature identifies organisational factors, in particular issues of human resource management, as being a dominant factor. However the literature has tended to consider staffing and organisational factors separately

Aims and objectives: we aim to determine whether relationships between the quality of clinical care and nurse staffing in general practice are attenuated or enhanced when organisational factors associated with quality of care are considered. We further aim to determine the relative contribution and interaction between these factors.

Method: we used routinely collected data on organisational factors and the quality of clinical care for a range of long term conditions: from 8409 English general practices. Regression models exploring the relationship of staffing and organisational factors with care quality were fitted using MPLUS

Results: higher levels of nurse staffing, clinical recording, education and reflection on the results of patient surveys were significantly associated with improved clinical care for COPD, CHD, Diabetes and Hypothyroidism after controlling for organisational factors. There was some evidence of attenuation of the estimated nurse staffing effect when organisational factors were considered, but this was small. The effect of staffing interacted significantly with the effect of organisational factors. Overall however, the characteristics that emerged as the strongest predictors of quality of clinical care were not staffing levels but the organisational factors of clinical recording, education and training and use of patient experience surveys.

Conclusions: organisational factors contribute significantly to observed variation in the quality of care in English general practices. Levels of nurse staffing have an independent association with quality but also interact with organisational factors. The observed relationships are not necessarily causal but a causal relationship is plausible. The benefits and importance of education, training and personal development of nursing and other practice staff was clearly indicated.


workforce, primary care, practice nurses, quality of care indicators, performance, staffing level, organisational factors, multivariate analysis
0020-7489
1199-1210
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Maben, Jill
3240b527-420c-498e-9f66-557b96561f40
Murrells, Trevor
9a57589a-d893-415c-8c3d-8b25d052f42c

Griffiths, Peter, Maben, Jill and Murrells, Trevor (2011) Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: observational study using routinely collected data. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48 (10), 1199-1210. (doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.03.011). (PMID:21571273)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: an association between quality of care and staffing levels, particularly registered nurses, has been established in acute hospitals. Recently an association between practice nurse staffing and quality of care for several chronic conditions has also been demonstrated in general practice. A smaller body of literature identifies organisational factors, in particular issues of human resource management, as being a dominant factor. However the literature has tended to consider staffing and organisational factors separately

Aims and objectives: we aim to determine whether relationships between the quality of clinical care and nurse staffing in general practice are attenuated or enhanced when organisational factors associated with quality of care are considered. We further aim to determine the relative contribution and interaction between these factors.

Method: we used routinely collected data on organisational factors and the quality of clinical care for a range of long term conditions: from 8409 English general practices. Regression models exploring the relationship of staffing and organisational factors with care quality were fitted using MPLUS

Results: higher levels of nurse staffing, clinical recording, education and reflection on the results of patient surveys were significantly associated with improved clinical care for COPD, CHD, Diabetes and Hypothyroidism after controlling for organisational factors. There was some evidence of attenuation of the estimated nurse staffing effect when organisational factors were considered, but this was small. The effect of staffing interacted significantly with the effect of organisational factors. Overall however, the characteristics that emerged as the strongest predictors of quality of clinical care were not staffing levels but the organisational factors of clinical recording, education and training and use of patient experience surveys.

Conclusions: organisational factors contribute significantly to observed variation in the quality of care in English general practices. Levels of nurse staffing have an independent association with quality but also interact with organisational factors. The observed relationships are not necessarily causal but a causal relationship is plausible. The benefits and importance of education, training and personal development of nursing and other practice staff was clearly indicated.


Text
QOF_factors_-_submitted.docx - Author's Original
Download (77kB)
Text
Tables_and_figures.docx - Author's Original
Download (246kB)
Text
IJNS_2011_qof_factors.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Submitted date: April 2011
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 May 2011
Published date: September 2011
Keywords: workforce, primary care, practice nurses, quality of care indicators, performance, staffing level, organisational factors, multivariate analysis
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 171855
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/171855
ISSN: 0020-7489
PURE UUID: 1e5ba6cf-59d9-4f67-9ed3-b88768601669
ORCID for Peter Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2857

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jan 2011 09:50
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Peter Griffiths ORCID iD
Author: Jill Maben
Author: Trevor Murrells

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×