What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI)


Harnad, Stevan (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI).

Download

[img] PDF - Updated Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (671Kb)
[img] Microsoft Word - Updated Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (633Kb)
[img]
Preview
PDF (White House Version)
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (730Kb) | Preview

Description/Abstract

The minimum should be to mandate that: (i) the fundee’s revised, accepted refereed final draft (ii) of all refereed journal articles (including refereed conference articles) resulting from the funded research must be (iii) deposited immediately upon acceptance for publication (iv) in the fundee’s institutional repository. (v) Access to the deposit must be made gratis OA (online access free for all) immediately (no OA embargo) wherever possible (over 60 % of journals already endorse immediate gratis OA self-archiving).

Item Type: Monograph (Technical Report)
Keywords: open access, mandates, USA, institutional repositories, Green OA
Divisions: Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 273080
Date :
Date Event
31 December 2011Submitted
Date Deposited: 01 Jan 2012 01:23
Last Modified: 31 Mar 2016 14:22
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/273080

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics