What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI)
Harnad, Stevan (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI). (Submitted)
Download
|
PDF
- Updated Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (671Kb) |
|
|
Microsoft Word
- Updated Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (633Kb) |
Description/Abstract
The minimum should be to mandate that: (i) the fundee’s revised, accepted refereed final draft (ii) of all refereed journal articles (including refereed conference articles) resulting from the funded research must be (iii) deposited immediately upon acceptance for publication (iv) in the fundee’s institutional repository. (v) Access to the deposit must be made gratis OA (online access free for all) immediately (no OA embargo) wherever possible (over 60 % of journals already endorse immediate gratis OA self-archiving).
| Item Type: | Monograph (Technical Report) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | open access, mandates, USA, institutional repositories, Green OA |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Physical and Applied Science > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science |
| Item ID: | 273080 |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Jan 2012 01:23 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Mar 2012 12:27 |
| Contributors: | Harnad, Stevan (Author) |
| Date: | 31 December 2011 |
| Status: | Submitted |
| Further Information: | Google Scholar |
| URI: | http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/273080 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |


