The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Faster than the speed of rejection: object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets

Faster than the speed of rejection: object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets
Faster than the speed of rejection: object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets
When engaged in a visual search for two targets, participants are slower and less accurate in their responses, relative to their performance when searching for singular targets. Previous work on this “dual-target cost” has primarily focused on the breakdown of attentional guidance when looking for two items. Here, we investigated how object identification processes are affected by dual-target search. Our goal was to chart the speed at which distractors could be rejected, to assess whether dual-target search impairs object identification. To do so, we examined the capacity coefficient, which measures the speed at which decisions can be made, and provides a baseline of parallel performance against which to compare. We found that participants could search at or above this baseline, suggesting that dual-target search does not impair object identification abilities. We also found substantial differences in performance when participants were asked to search for simple versus complex images. Somewhat paradoxically, participants were able to reject complex images more rapidly than simple images. We suggest that this reflects the greater number of features that can be used to identify complex images, a finding that has important consequences for understanding object identification in visual search more generally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
0096-1523
1007-1020
Godwin, H.J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Walenchok, S.C.
d597b64d-f0ba-4f2f-880b-e6985625f967
Houpt, J.W.
97218b53-df4b-4198-b738-14e64c414d0f
Hout, M.C.
6284da91-ecbd-4e5b-8a61-1332645c0665
Goldinger, S.D.
e6e8b921-7b5c-4e27-8e86-63522ef2fb34
Godwin, H.J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Walenchok, S.C.
d597b64d-f0ba-4f2f-880b-e6985625f967
Houpt, J.W.
97218b53-df4b-4198-b738-14e64c414d0f
Hout, M.C.
6284da91-ecbd-4e5b-8a61-1332645c0665
Goldinger, S.D.
e6e8b921-7b5c-4e27-8e86-63522ef2fb34

Godwin, H.J., Walenchok, S.C., Houpt, J.W., Hout, M.C. and Goldinger, S.D. (2015) Faster than the speed of rejection: object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41 (4), 1007-1020. (doi:10.1037/xhp0000036).

Record type: Article

Abstract

When engaged in a visual search for two targets, participants are slower and less accurate in their responses, relative to their performance when searching for singular targets. Previous work on this “dual-target cost” has primarily focused on the breakdown of attentional guidance when looking for two items. Here, we investigated how object identification processes are affected by dual-target search. Our goal was to chart the speed at which distractors could be rejected, to assess whether dual-target search impairs object identification. To do so, we examined the capacity coefficient, which measures the speed at which decisions can be made, and provides a baseline of parallel performance against which to compare. We found that participants could search at or above this baseline, suggesting that dual-target search does not impair object identification abilities. We also found substantial differences in performance when participants were asked to search for simple versus complex images. Somewhat paradoxically, participants were able to reject complex images more rapidly than simple images. We suggest that this reflects the greater number of features that can be used to identify complex images, a finding that has important consequences for understanding object identification in visual search more generally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Text
Godwin Capacity Coefficient Eprints.docx - Other
Download (6MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 January 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 August 2015
Published date: August 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 374075
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/374075
ISSN: 0096-1523
PURE UUID: edc16168-8d71-4992-a0d6-3efea717b341
ORCID for H.J. Godwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-1232-500X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Feb 2015 15:26
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: H.J. Godwin ORCID iD
Author: S.C. Walenchok
Author: J.W. Houpt
Author: M.C. Hout
Author: S.D. Goldinger

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×