Enhanced objective Bayesian testing for the equality of two proportions
Enhanced objective Bayesian testing for the equality of two proportions
We develop a new class of prior distributions for Bayesian comparison of nested models, which we call intrinsic moment priors, by combining the well-established notion of intrinsic prior with the recently introduced idea of non-local priors, and in particular of moment priors. Specifically, we aim at testing the equality of two proportions, based on independent samples, and thus focus on discrete data models. Given two nested models, each equipped with a default prior, we first construct a moment prior under the larger model. In this way, the asymptotic learning behavior of the Bayes factor is strengthened, relative to currently used local priors, when the smaller model holds; remarkably, this effect is already apparent for moderate sample sizes. On the other hand, the symptotic learning behavior of the Bayes factor when the larger model holds is unchanged. However, without appropriate tuning, a moment prior does not provide enough evidence for the larger model when the sample size is small and the data only moderately support the smaller one. For this reason, we apply to the moment prior an intrinsic prior procedure, which amounts to pulling the moment prior towards the subspace specified by the smaller model; we provide general guidelines for determining the training sample size necessary to implement this step. Thus, by joining the virtues of moment and intrinsic priors, we obtain an enhanced objective Bayesian testing procedure: i) our evidence for small samples is broadly comparable to that given by current objective methods; ii) we achieve a superior learning performance as the sample size increases (when the smaller model holds). We first illustrate our methodology in a running Bernoulli example, where we test a sharp null hypothesis, then we implement our procedure to test the equality of two proportions. A detailed analysis of the properties of our method, including a comparison with standard intrinsic priors, is presented together with an application to a collection of real-world 2 by 2 tables involving a sensitivity analysis and a crossvalidation study.
bayes factor, intrinsic prior, model choice, moment prior, non-local prior, training sample size
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
Consonni, Guido
0e3fc0a4-388c-450d-8a9c-3ca9bb4a720b
Forster, Jonathan J.
e3c534ad-fa69-42f5-b67b-11617bc84879
La Rocca, Luca
2c184dd4-1a7a-422f-b8a9-4dd5e9c9a4ee
18 October 2010
Consonni, Guido
0e3fc0a4-388c-450d-8a9c-3ca9bb4a720b
Forster, Jonathan J.
e3c534ad-fa69-42f5-b67b-11617bc84879
La Rocca, Luca
2c184dd4-1a7a-422f-b8a9-4dd5e9c9a4ee
Consonni, Guido, Forster, Jonathan J. and La Rocca, Luca
(2010)
Enhanced objective Bayesian testing for the equality of two proportions
(S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M10/13)
Southampton, GB.
Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton
29pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
We develop a new class of prior distributions for Bayesian comparison of nested models, which we call intrinsic moment priors, by combining the well-established notion of intrinsic prior with the recently introduced idea of non-local priors, and in particular of moment priors. Specifically, we aim at testing the equality of two proportions, based on independent samples, and thus focus on discrete data models. Given two nested models, each equipped with a default prior, we first construct a moment prior under the larger model. In this way, the asymptotic learning behavior of the Bayes factor is strengthened, relative to currently used local priors, when the smaller model holds; remarkably, this effect is already apparent for moderate sample sizes. On the other hand, the symptotic learning behavior of the Bayes factor when the larger model holds is unchanged. However, without appropriate tuning, a moment prior does not provide enough evidence for the larger model when the sample size is small and the data only moderately support the smaller one. For this reason, we apply to the moment prior an intrinsic prior procedure, which amounts to pulling the moment prior towards the subspace specified by the smaller model; we provide general guidelines for determining the training sample size necessary to implement this step. Thus, by joining the virtues of moment and intrinsic priors, we obtain an enhanced objective Bayesian testing procedure: i) our evidence for small samples is broadly comparable to that given by current objective methods; ii) we achieve a superior learning performance as the sample size increases (when the smaller model holds). We first illustrate our methodology in a running Bernoulli example, where we test a sharp null hypothesis, then we implement our procedure to test the equality of two proportions. A detailed analysis of the properties of our method, including a comparison with standard intrinsic priors, is presented together with an application to a collection of real-world 2 by 2 tables involving a sensitivity analysis and a crossvalidation study.
Text
s3ri-workingpaper-M10-13.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 18 October 2010
Keywords:
bayes factor, intrinsic prior, model choice, moment prior, non-local prior, training sample size
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 165755
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/165755
PURE UUID: a4aec5f0-f51d-4052-b8cb-4ace6db167ec
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Oct 2010 07:57
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:37
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Guido Consonni
Author:
Jonathan J. Forster
Author:
Luca La Rocca
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics