The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Process and practicalities: mutual legal assistance and the investigation of transnational crime within the EU from a UK perspective, 1990-2004

Process and practicalities: mutual legal assistance and the investigation of transnational crime within the EU from a UK perspective, 1990-2004
Process and practicalities: mutual legal assistance and the investigation of transnational crime within the EU from a UK perspective, 1990-2004
Domestic criminal law helps define State sovereign identity. Over the past fifty years some criminality has become increasingly transnational in character. In the absence of a universal criminal code (as opposed to specified international crimes), States apply municipal law to prosecute offences of a transnational nature relying on mutual legal assistanceto secure evidence located outside the prosecuting State.

A comparatively late contributor to the development of mutual legal assistance the UK now seeks to influence the work of the EU in developing a legal framework upon which to base mutual legal assistance and enhanced international law enforcement co-operation. The course of this developmentis outlined.

This thesis examines through questionnaire and interview data, investigator and prosecutor experience of mutual legal assistance mechanisms in gathering of evidence from abroad for use at trial in England and Wales. Comparisons are made with data from an earlier survey of UK police (1996) and with an evaluation of mutual legal assistance administrative mechanisms within the EU (1999-2001) in order to identify changes in investigator experiences since the EU began to drive the strategic development of regional international law enforcement co-operation with the Treaty of Amsterdam and to assess whether politicians and administrators are delivering the solutions needed by investigators working across national borders.

Set within the legislative context of the Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990, the data indicate that neither this regime nor the emerging EU framework were addressing all practitioner concerns. Political responsesto the New York terrorist attacks of September 2001, which occurred during data gathering for this thesis, accelerated legislative construction in the UK and the EU. Updated to include discussion of these changes (some still not yet entered into force), the thesis now provides a benchmark against which to assess their impact in due course.
University of Southampton
Harfield, Clive Geoffrey
99f30be7-e2a5-4935-bf85-11b7c8c4b0c1
Harfield, Clive Geoffrey
99f30be7-e2a5-4935-bf85-11b7c8c4b0c1
Gregory, Frank
bcd32335-ee70-4be3-8ca5-e9ad84bdd0fb

Harfield, Clive Geoffrey (2004) Process and practicalities: mutual legal assistance and the investigation of transnational crime within the EU from a UK perspective, 1990-2004. University of Southampton, School of Social Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, 284pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Domestic criminal law helps define State sovereign identity. Over the past fifty years some criminality has become increasingly transnational in character. In the absence of a universal criminal code (as opposed to specified international crimes), States apply municipal law to prosecute offences of a transnational nature relying on mutual legal assistanceto secure evidence located outside the prosecuting State.

A comparatively late contributor to the development of mutual legal assistance the UK now seeks to influence the work of the EU in developing a legal framework upon which to base mutual legal assistance and enhanced international law enforcement co-operation. The course of this developmentis outlined.

This thesis examines through questionnaire and interview data, investigator and prosecutor experience of mutual legal assistance mechanisms in gathering of evidence from abroad for use at trial in England and Wales. Comparisons are made with data from an earlier survey of UK police (1996) and with an evaluation of mutual legal assistance administrative mechanisms within the EU (1999-2001) in order to identify changes in investigator experiences since the EU began to drive the strategic development of regional international law enforcement co-operation with the Treaty of Amsterdam and to assess whether politicians and administrators are delivering the solutions needed by investigators working across national borders.

Set within the legislative context of the Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990, the data indicate that neither this regime nor the emerging EU framework were addressing all practitioner concerns. Political responsesto the New York terrorist attacks of September 2001, which occurred during data gathering for this thesis, accelerated legislative construction in the UK and the EU. Updated to include discussion of these changes (some still not yet entered into force), the thesis now provides a benchmark against which to assess their impact in due course.

Text
00303443.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (20MB)

More information

Published date: December 2004
Organisations: University of Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 194559
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/194559
PURE UUID: aa2f8b4c-24c3-43b8-98bb-aeb1ce85e7c4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2011 16:12
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:00

Export record

Contributors

Author: Clive Geoffrey Harfield
Thesis advisor: Frank Gregory

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×