Epsilon–First Policies for Budget–Limited Multi-Armed Bandits
Epsilon–First Policies for Budget–Limited Multi-Armed Bandits
  We introduce the budget–limited multi–armed bandit (MAB), which captures situations where a learner’s actions are costly and constrained by a fixed budget that is incommensurable with the rewards earned from the bandit machine, and then describe a first algorithm for solving it. Since the learner has a budget, the problem’s duration is finite. Consequently an optimal exploitation policy is not to pull the optimal arm repeatedly, but to pull the combination of arms that maximises the agent’s total reward within the budget. As such, the rewards for all arms must be estimated, because any of them may appear in the optimal combination. This difference from existing MABs means that new approaches to maximising the total reward are required. To this end, we propose an epsilon–first algorithm, in which the first epsilon of the budget is used solely to learn the arms’ rewards (exploration), while the remaining 1 ? epsilon is used to maximise the received reward based on those estimates (exploitation). We derive bounds on the algorithm’s loss for generic and uniform exploration methods, and compare its performance with traditional MAB algorithms under various distributions of rewards and costs, showing that it outperforms the others by up to 50%.
  1211-1216
  
    
      Tran-Thanh, Long
      
        e0666669-d34b-460e-950d-e8b139fab16c
      
     
  
    
      Chapman, Archie
      
        2eac6920-2aff-49ab-8d8e-a0ea3e39ba60
      
     
  
    
      Munoz De Cote Flores Luna, Jose Enrique
      
        afb4bdd8-8511-4961-a639-15521220a213
      
     
  
    
      Rogers, Alex
      
        f9130bc6-da32-474e-9fab-6c6cb8077fdc
      
     
  
    
      Jennings, Nicholas R.
      
        ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      6 April 2010
    
    
  
  
    
      Tran-Thanh, Long
      
        e0666669-d34b-460e-950d-e8b139fab16c
      
     
  
    
      Chapman, Archie
      
        2eac6920-2aff-49ab-8d8e-a0ea3e39ba60
      
     
  
    
      Munoz De Cote Flores Luna, Jose Enrique
      
        afb4bdd8-8511-4961-a639-15521220a213
      
     
  
    
      Rogers, Alex
      
        f9130bc6-da32-474e-9fab-6c6cb8077fdc
      
     
  
    
      Jennings, Nicholas R.
      
        ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
    Tran-Thanh, Long, Chapman, Archie, Munoz De Cote Flores Luna, Jose Enrique, Rogers, Alex and Jennings, Nicholas R.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2010)
  
  
    
    Epsilon–First Policies for Budget–Limited Multi-Armed Bandits.
  
  
  
  
    
    
    
      
        
   
  
    Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, USA, Georgia.
   
        
        
        11 - 15  Jul 2010.
      
    
  
  
  
      
          
          
        .
    
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      Record type:
      Conference or Workshop Item
      (Paper)
      
      
    
   
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          We introduce the budget–limited multi–armed bandit (MAB), which captures situations where a learner’s actions are costly and constrained by a fixed budget that is incommensurable with the rewards earned from the bandit machine, and then describe a first algorithm for solving it. Since the learner has a budget, the problem’s duration is finite. Consequently an optimal exploitation policy is not to pull the optimal arm repeatedly, but to pull the combination of arms that maximises the agent’s total reward within the budget. As such, the rewards for all arms must be estimated, because any of them may appear in the optimal combination. This difference from existing MABs means that new approaches to maximising the total reward are required. To this end, we propose an epsilon–first algorithm, in which the first epsilon of the budget is used solely to learn the arms’ rewards (exploration), while the remaining 1 ? epsilon is used to maximise the received reward based on those estimates (exploitation). We derive bounds on the algorithm’s loss for generic and uniform exploration methods, and compare its performance with traditional MAB algorithms under various distributions of rewards and costs, showing that it outperforms the others by up to 50%.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 LTT_AAAI2010_Bandit.pdf
     - Accepted Manuscript
   
  
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
          
            
  
    Text
 AAAI2010_Tran-Thanh.pdf
     - Version of Record
   
  
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: 6 April 2010
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
     
        Additional Information:
        Event Dates: 11 - 15 July, 2010
      
    
  
    
     
        Venue - Dates:
        Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, USA, Georgia, 2010-07-11 - 2010-07-15
      
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Agents, Interactions & Complexity
      
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 270806
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/270806
        
        
        
        
          PURE UUID: 8c22dc28-c4a4-403f-9f44-f71e86429e1e
        
  
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 06 Apr 2010 16:45
  Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 09:16
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Long Tran-Thanh
              
              
                
              
            
            
          
         
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Archie Chapman
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Jose Enrique Munoz De Cote Flores Luna
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Alex Rogers
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Nicholas R. Jennings
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics