What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI)


Harnad, Stevan (2011) What Is To Be Done About Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications Resulting From Federally Funded Research? (Response to US OSTP RFI) s.n.

Download

[img] Other COMPETES1-harnad.docx - Other
Available under License Other.

Download (648kB)
[img] PDF COMPETES3-harnad.pdf - Other
Available under License Other.

Download (687kB)
[img] PDF scholarly-pubs-(#104) harnad.pdf - Other
Available under License Other.

Download (748kB)

Description/Abstract

The minimum should be to mandate that: (i) the fundee’s revised, accepted refereed final draft (ii) of all refereed journal articles (including refereed conference articles) resulting from the funded research must be (iii) deposited immediately upon acceptance for publication (iv) in the fundee’s institutional repository. (v) Access to the deposit must be made gratis OA (online access free for all) immediately (no OA embargo) wherever possible (over 60 % of journals already endorse immediate gratis OA self-archiving).

Item Type: Monograph (Project Report)
Keywords: open access, mandates, USA, institutional repositories, Green OA
Organisations: Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 273080
Date :
Date Event
31 December 2011Submitted
Date Deposited: 01 Jan 2012 01:23
Last Modified: 23 Feb 2017 08:15
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/273080

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item