Leadership and self-enforcing international environmental agreements with non-negative emissions
Leadership and self-enforcing international environmental agreements with non-negative emissions
For the widely-used linear-quadratic model of stable IEAs the key results are: (i) if the members of the IEA act in a Cournot fashion with respect to non-signatories, a stable IEA has no more than 2 signatories; (ii) if the signatories act as Stackelberg leaders, a stable IEA can have any number of signatories. These results were derived using numerical simulations and ignored the non-negativity constraint on emissions. Recent papers using analytical approaches and explicitly recognising the non-negativity constraint have suggested that with Stackelberg leadership a stable IEA has at most four signatories. Such papers have introduced non-negativity constraints by restricting parameter values to ensure interior solutions for emissions, which restricts the number of signatories. We use the more appropriate approach of directly imposing the non-negativity constraint on emissions, recognising that for some parameter values this will entail corner solutions, and show, analytically, that the key results from the literature go through.
University of Southampton
Rubio, S.
51afdea0-7086-4280-b3d8-41674e11120c
Ulph, A.
08e98aec-a43b-4d20-8bc1-30f642634570
2002
Rubio, S.
51afdea0-7086-4280-b3d8-41674e11120c
Ulph, A.
08e98aec-a43b-4d20-8bc1-30f642634570
Rubio, S. and Ulph, A.
(2002)
Leadership and self-enforcing international environmental agreements with non-negative emissions
(Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics, 211)
Southampton.
University of Southampton
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
Abstract
For the widely-used linear-quadratic model of stable IEAs the key results are: (i) if the members of the IEA act in a Cournot fashion with respect to non-signatories, a stable IEA has no more than 2 signatories; (ii) if the signatories act as Stackelberg leaders, a stable IEA can have any number of signatories. These results were derived using numerical simulations and ignored the non-negativity constraint on emissions. Recent papers using analytical approaches and explicitly recognising the non-negativity constraint have suggested that with Stackelberg leadership a stable IEA has at most four signatories. Such papers have introduced non-negativity constraints by restricting parameter values to ensure interior solutions for emissions, which restricts the number of signatories. We use the more appropriate approach of directly imposing the non-negativity constraint on emissions, recognising that for some parameter values this will entail corner solutions, and show, analytically, that the key results from the literature go through.
More information
Published date: 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 33382
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33382
PURE UUID: 51dde1a3-9050-4347-b1c0-15cb5b157cc6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:43
Export record
Contributors
Author:
S. Rubio
Author:
A. Ulph
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics