Don’t blame me! The role and scope of the principle of ‘double effect’
Don’t blame me! The role and scope of the principle of ‘double effect’
The concept of 'double effect' is used both as a technical doctrine and more loosely to capture the idea that sometimes we have to make a 'tragic choice' - one that we would prefer not to have to make. The ethical 'doctrine' of double effect identifies a narrow range of circumstances in which it may be acceptable to do something that indirectly compromises a fundamental moral obligation where to do so is the only way to promote another fundamental value. It is different from the looser idea of 'the lesser of two evils' which nay be sufficient for some ethical approaches. The law uses a slightly different version of the concept, to explain why palliative steps that are known to risk incidentally shortening a patient's life may permissible providing that they are close to death, the treatment is professionally appropriate, and the motive is palliative not to cause death. It has also accepted some extreme circumstance where it is possible to justify causing the death of one person to prevent two deaths, theirs and another. This presentation explains these usages of 'double effect' and their application to paediatric palliative care
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
13 July 2012
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
(2012)
Don’t blame me! The role and scope of the principle of ‘double effect’.
Science, Meaning and Morality: the Palliative Package? 6th international conference on paediatric palliative care, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
11 - 13 Jul 2012.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Other)
Abstract
The concept of 'double effect' is used both as a technical doctrine and more loosely to capture the idea that sometimes we have to make a 'tragic choice' - one that we would prefer not to have to make. The ethical 'doctrine' of double effect identifies a narrow range of circumstances in which it may be acceptable to do something that indirectly compromises a fundamental moral obligation where to do so is the only way to promote another fundamental value. It is different from the looser idea of 'the lesser of two evils' which nay be sufficient for some ethical approaches. The law uses a slightly different version of the concept, to explain why palliative steps that are known to risk incidentally shortening a patient's life may permissible providing that they are close to death, the treatment is professionally appropriate, and the motive is palliative not to cause death. It has also accepted some extreme circumstance where it is possible to justify causing the death of one person to prevent two deaths, theirs and another. This presentation explains these usages of 'double effect' and their application to paediatric palliative care
Slideshow
Double_Effect.pptx
- Other
More information
Published date: 13 July 2012
Venue - Dates:
Science, Meaning and Morality: the Palliative Package? 6th international conference on paediatric palliative care, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2012-07-11 - 2012-07-13
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 341571
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341571
PURE UUID: 754f3feb-2c51-4719-b513-d394cdf4cfd2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Jul 2012 14:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:41
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Montgomery
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics