The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research

But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research
But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research
This paper is an exploration of the tensions inherent in the interaction between ethics and methodological innovation. The authors focus on three cases of innovation in qualitative research methods in the social sciences: netnography, child-led research, and creative research methods. Using thematic analysis of data collected through semi-structured interviews with the innovators and commentators on the innovations, they discuss the cases in terms of ethical responsibly, the democratisation of research, matters of empowerment, and the relationship between research and the academy. The paper highlights the ways in which innovation does not necessarily equate to taking risks but rather to risk management: the innovators are cautious as much as creative, operating within the context of a culture in which procedural ethical regulation acts to limit methodological development, and in which they (and other users of their method/approach) communicate the safe qualities alongside the innovative qualities of their approach.
18-33
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Bengry-Howell, Andrew
d8c2888e-296c-4aa8-9b44-2867e8820158
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef
Wiles, Rose
5bdc597b-716c-4f60-9f45-631ecca25571
Bengry-Howell, Andrew
d8c2888e-296c-4aa8-9b44-2867e8820158
Crow, Graham
723761e4-bba1-4eba-9672-e7029f547fce
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef

Wiles, Rose, Bengry-Howell, Andrew, Crow, Graham and Nind, Melanie (2013) But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8 (1), 18-33. (doi:10.4256/mio.2013.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper is an exploration of the tensions inherent in the interaction between ethics and methodological innovation. The authors focus on three cases of innovation in qualitative research methods in the social sciences: netnography, child-led research, and creative research methods. Using thematic analysis of data collected through semi-structured interviews with the innovators and commentators on the innovations, they discuss the cases in terms of ethical responsibly, the democratisation of research, matters of empowerment, and the relationship between research and the academy. The paper highlights the ways in which innovation does not necessarily equate to taking risks but rather to risk management: the innovators are cautious as much as creative, operating within the context of a culture in which procedural ethical regulation acts to limit methodological development, and in which they (and other users of their method/approach) communicate the safe qualities alongside the innovative qualities of their approach.

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_man_mydocuments_articles_NCRM_But is it innovation for Eprints.docx - Author's Original
Download (132kB)

More information

Published date: November 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 360317
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/360317
PURE UUID: 9a2e697f-f395-4084-a120-af0d8057ffed
ORCID for Melanie Nind: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-7513

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Dec 2013 15:18
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rose Wiles
Author: Andrew Bengry-Howell
Author: Graham Crow
Author: Melanie Nind ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×